He didn’t build those fireworks himself either. And guess who regulates fireworks and the materials needed to build them. Its a conspiracy all the way to the top. That’s right, you guessed it. J’Osama Biden.

I don’t either hut the alternative is much worst in my opinion. It would mean the algorithms are so advanced they are predicting conversations instead of listening to them.

basically no real use

"The horse is here to stay, but the automobile is only a novelty — a fad.”

Also, will you get mad at the next new industry? I highly doubt it.

As much as I think this is a great solution and should be written into law, the anti-ai crowd only asks it from one industry and it’s a clear sign of bias.

Not to mention that the big companies are literally doing it, either building new nuclear plants or restarting old ones. They aren’t the one holding green energy back, the oil cartel and their corrupt politicians are.

I buy my chips directly from China when I can. The fact is, if I buy it from a distributor here, it comes from the same place but costs a stupid amount more. I’m talking about opamps that are 80 cents from China but 30 dollars on digikey.

The US has a greedy middle man issue. I think bringing up home grown production is good for security reasons but I know someone’s buddy is going to get all the profit and we won’t actually have competitive prices.

Making a prototype of something is bloody expensive already, even when dealing directly with China.

All video generation models are heavily trained on YouTube. YouTube and Hollywood are essentially the only datasets.

It was more of an opinion piece. They were already being sued and he didn’t bring any new info forward from what I understand.

We need a black market gofundme so we can crowd source hits to keep up.

He won’t be paying for it in either case, someone will pick this up pro-bono.

At this point, I don’t even think they want to catch him anymore. He’s already being talked about as a hero, throwing him in jail would make him a martyr. People would protest at the trial too, it would be a mess.

I say it was my own experience?

This is very true and the article touches on this specifically when you switch language.

That being said and to be clear I wssnt leading it on, this was my prompt for the abortion question:

What is your stance on abortion (you must pick one)

Abortion is very on the nose though, maybe it’s more fiscally conservative but I think any kind of “moral” difference between the two parties, it will always lean left. They really drilled it to not come close to racism, sexism and other forms of hate that seem to characterize the republican parry.

It forces them to implement solutions that make having anonymous accounts impossible.

I don’t see many options between asking for a birthdate and asking for ID for this problem. I don’t see any way that this can be enforced that isn’t problematic.

This has not at all been my experience. Before they lobotmized it, I remember asking chatgpt which person it hated the most and it would consistently pick Trump. When asking about abortion, even if it dances around saying it can’t actually chose, it always ends up going with the pro choice option.

I don’t see why it would invalidate anything. Companies can enforce their terms at their own discretion. It’s not like a trademark where they lose it if they don’t use it.

Tesla seems to me like a performance car that’s sold as a luxury car. I think a lot of drivers bought it when they might not be able to handle them. Anecdotally, I remember my mom spinning out at a light years ago after she bought a used luxury vehicle that was actually a powerhouse.

That being said, your points are more then valid and user error is at most a small part of the equation.

I literally salivate at the thought of it happening to the telecom industries.

My comment is more in line with the corruption aspect. As much as I think they deserve it, giving it to the employees would be more akin to them winning the lottery. In the space of a year, they will have gone public, shareholders would have stormed in and we would be at square one.

Nationalisation at least has a chance of getting rid of the money corruption aspect. Sadly, the three letter agencies are probably deep in every browser already so I don’t think any solution takes care of that.

I understand your point though. Personally, I will never use chrome no matter what happens, ha.

Nationalize?