Well said

Addition: I found the graph

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Guy_Macon/Wikipedia_has_Cancer

Here is an article about the issue https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Fundraising/issues

There was a great graph which I cannot find about how Wikimedia (Wikipedia owners) is hoarding massive amounts of money and doing unnecessary fundraisers. Their capital has bloated to infinity. Wikimedia already is a corporation.

To top it off their owners are Zionists who tried to use their influence to stop the Wikipedia page calling Gaza a genocide but failed.

Wikipedia is flooded with donations. They are super corrupt. Do not give them more money.

Oh the bright side: smaller local models are getting very good

On the bad side: large models are always a year ahead so everyone wants to keep using the datacenter ones.

Bugs being fixed = sloppification?

Good.

On Reddit I mean. There are many tool for it like https://roastdit.kadoa.com/ especially used by right-wingers. (disclaimer I do not know what the exact tool they use is, probably not that one)

There is no functional difference between Bluesky and Twtitter. At least Mastodon is decentralized

Did he buy into their hype claims of sentient AI?

Every post history digger uses AI tools to summarize user posts and then picks something to attack them on.

Sucks to live in the real world with real money instead of colonial dollars that can be infinitely printed

A Jewish Zionist urges you to continue donating to Jewish Zionist Wikimedia foundation? Shocker

China is smart enough to not be dependent on sources they do not control. The US has leverage over the Gulf but China has nowhere near it. That is why they are so bullish on renewables.

Heavy jnvestment in battery industry and government steered subsidies into renewables vs endless money to bomb brown people.

Unless their increasing demand for energy is infinite clean energy will outpace coal at this rate and even absolute coal usage will decrease soon.

Land of the free

Shipping is a very small problem. In exchange for efficient centralized mass factory production it is no issue at all.

I am only calling out the inconsistency of their statement.

So you can do a little copyright violation but not too much?