“autocorrect” AI glorified autocorrect…

Wait

To put it more generally, corporations are people when it’s good to be a person, but not when it’s bad to be a person

I’m with ya. Especially with the blatant kiss assery from these two companies to the government, this headlines reads to me as “Google and Meta have agreed to give Trump even more money so that they can add even more surveillance to their products”

I feel like this isn’t a reciprocal thing though. “Guy does good thing” /=/ “You shouldn’t question his judgement/his other ideas are also good. ” feels fair

However

“Guy does bad thing” = “You should question his judgement/his other ideas tend to also be bad” also feels fair

The pope doesn’t like AI, brandished a sword and called people idiots. More at 11

Not the person you replied to, but I don’t imagine I’m the only one that would just say yes to this.

With the advancements in wine and proton, I’ve found a lot of games do well with adding -dx11 or -dx12 in the launch options.

Maybe a ticket could be made about considering changing the default for one of those programs

I really agree. I let my partner try out my steam deck (immutable arch instead of Fedora, but ultimately the same experience. Flatpaks and easy updates). They fell in love with it, so I bought a second one for them. It’s been a year now, running it almost exclusively on desktop mode and using it as a Linux desktop.

I haven’t even shown them the terminal yet.

They’re not calling Rust unsafe. There is a memory safe mode and a memory unsafe mode in Rust, and this was built in unsafe Rust which allowed for the memory bug to be exploited

So… so are they. The new media has not yet been tested for 100 years because they were not invented 100 years ago

Currently using obsidian, will check this out ASAP

Of GNOME or KDE? Because both of them leave gunk in system files when removed

This just isn’t true. There are tons of dependencies that are going to get left all over the place

Right. But cleaning up the old files left over from swapping your DE is much easier if you actually have read and write access to those files. When you swap DEs, it’s gonna leave shit behind whether you’re atomic or not. But atomic systems have more barriers to cleaning them up, to prevent the user from accidentally cleaning the wrong things.

On atomic systems like Bazzite and the universal blues, getting rid of the old files from the previous DE can be a huge hassle. On normal systems it’s a lot easier

To keep an eye on pets

Tbh I’m just new to the computer science scene - I’ve taken one class so far on the fundamentals of programming and have only seen a real language in my free time as of yet.

It didn’t occur to me that the webpage which references another for an image would still be culpable for the space taken up by the image, because with on-disk memory management you can do tricks to reduce sizes with pointers and I just thought it would be analogous. It feels painfully obvious to me why that’s stupid now lol

Once the users browser has the path to that image…

I dunno why that didn’t occur to me, that makes sense

Do you actually have to provide the image? Couldn’t you provide a pointer to the image? Like those thumbnails that are just links on the backends but appear as images when loaded

deleted by creator