Saapas

Certified .ml moment

You’re not playing the parts that you skipped or let AI play for you, was what I was getting at

If you’re disabled and can’t actually do those things…?

If you can’t actually do a thing then it sounds like you’re saying you aren’t doing the thing?

Absolutely not, they would be considered playing

Did I understand correctly that in an otherwise identical situation, disabled person who is watching sports is playing sports in your opinion (while also saying they can’t play sports), even though an able person watching sports isn’t playing them?

That sounds contradictory.

You just agreed with me in your watching sports example… Another you might agree with is that watching someone’s lets play probably doesn’t count as playing the game.

You were supposed to quote a part that said either of those things, instead of simply asking if it counts as playing the game if the game is doing the playing for you.

People love watching sports, they aren’t playing are they?

That’s… exactly the point?

you merely interact with the screen.

In a point and click game if you are pointing and clicking it sounds like you are playing the game?

Please go ahead and quote where you think it says either of those things.

Depends how they implement it. Older option was to use cheats to skip parts and maybe watch a video if you want to see what happened in the part you skipped.

Why do you think you have to “play” to fully enjoy something?

Where do you think I said or even implied this?

Why do you think “let’s play” videos exist?

Entertainment

Are you really playing the game if the game is just playing itself?

I did say I’m having hard time imagining what you meant. That’s why I was hoping for an example. Dunno about the rest of what you’re talking about, sorry

If it said JD Vance actually a black man from Malaysia I’d find that pretty funny too, yeah

I’m having hard time imagining what sort of stuff it would’ve said in this imaginary scenario

It’s not gay to fuck yourself in drag. If anything that’s straighter than jerking off the regular way!

That sounds a bit ridiculous

I’d be careful, people get banned for saying that sort of thing

Thanks man, I appreciate it

I feel like it would be a lot more ironic if the tool didn’t work. It doesn’t seem very ironic to use hammer to remove nails hammered into incorrect position with a hammer imo.

I mean it’s not really my take,it’s just when they’ve tested it out at different tasks. It does a lot better at coding than most other tasks.

I mean in this specific case it did make a working tool to identify hallucinated sources.

And yes it’s definitely better at code than doing something requiring the sort of thinking that Wikipedia edits require. I’m not drawing that from this singular thing but rather when they’ve studied the correctness of AI output. Coding is sorta “easy” for a computer to do compared to language and information tasks in that sort of free-er form way.

But it did create a working tool to identify AI contributions with fake ISBN, didn’t it? Are we assuming the tool from OP wasn’t working?