I didn’t get that it’s hiding anything. says it right there in the blurb:

The agency said it cannot ban personalized pricing under its current authority, but it will pursue enforcement action against companies that fail to meet its disclosure requirements.

Unless I’m missing something, I understood that to mean exactly what you said.

that’s gonna be a very very expensive phone

yes… lol people on HackerNews tend to do this a lot and it really does get annoying. it forces the reader to process what you’re trying to say unnecessarily.

yup and when you DO catch it spitting out nonsense. it"ll say “oh you right, let me change that”… 🙄 like, why do I have to tell you that you’re wrong about something? You should already know it’s wrong and fix it without me ever pointing it out.

It really irks me when people change the titles of the articles they link to to try to fit their narrative. Because sadly people dont really click through to the article. Just share the real title and give your commentary on the comments.

I think the person you replied to is just assuming it’s off by default. But if there’s a kill switch, that implies that it’s on. And if not, there wouldn’t be any need for a kill switch.

Is this really new just because AI is here, though? Even before AI, any kid that was an over-achiever, actually studied unlike their peers, continues to work harder to achieve greater things (even when the masses don’t) experiences this exact same path all their life.

Is this any different from how one starts to look as they grow older in age?

Anybody else hungry?

Yeah, will never understand why these big billionaires keep taking these “we are for the people” stances, but are still trying to spin up these same ol for-profit, centralized products. If they really cared, they’d use that money to help nonprofits or decentralized services and stay out of the damn way.

The Chinese have it right with the food too. Love me egg foo yung

And probably not as intentional as most people think it is vs just laziness and maybe a lack of planning.

This is so mildy pedantic it’s adorable lol

This is so true. It costs more money for the server power required for something like that to be pulled off.

There’s a comment in this thread going all crazy complaining about it being costly to host anything on the protocol to stop Bluesky from dominating it and everything. But im like “uhh yeah, servers and storage costs money”.

It’s just so weird how everyone thinks hosting popular sites should be free.

Right, and what’s even as bizarre to me (as an engineer) is that they’re bots posing as people.

That’s arguably the most deceptive and malicious way to use a bot on a site meant for real people.

But they’ll quickly block any helpful bots anyone else tries to integrate on the platform.

“Our bad bots good, your good bots bad”. What a crazy world we live in.

Not interested in the short-video concept. But I like the name, though. Short, sweet, doesn’t sound too “techy”, not too complicated to pronounce or spell.

deleted by creator

Didn’t someone create this same thing a few weeks ago? 🤔

Ubuntu here as well! Sticking with just the LTS versions tho 😎

Interesting take I can appreciate, but hold on there…

This community here seems to have largely sided with ScarJo. Which means that they want famous people to receive a rent for lending out their voices

I dont think that’s what they mean at all. I doubt people care about ScarJo growing her bank account. I think most people who side with ScarJo just dont want Open AI stealing stuff it doesnt own, including people’s voices. Especially if they’re profiting off it.