• Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Terrorism, in its broadest sense, is the use of violence against non-combatants to achieve political or ideological aims.

    While it’s likely there were civilians hurt by this, the target was undeniably Hesbollah. So no, not terrorism.

    • archomrade [he/him]@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Likely because the bulk of those wounded by this attack were not Hezbollah

      I don’t even know how you’d reasonably expect to only injure your targets in an attack as widespread and remote as this one. Seems blatantly indiscriminate at best.

      • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        Likely because the bulk of those wounded by this attack were not Hezbollah

        What makes you think that? These pagers were bought by Hesbollah to be used by their guys.

        • archomrade [he/him]@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          Uhhh, because these were bombs - bombs that were remotely and indiscriminately detonated. Some of the people were driving, some standing next to children or on busses full of people. There are reports of children who died because they were standing next to a target at head-level with the pager.There’s no guarantee they were even being carried by “Hezbollah’s guys”.

          I don’t even know why anyone would assume otherwise. This was a loosely targeted terror attack

      • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        National order isnt based on tit for tat. If someone commits a war crime against you it doesnt mean you get to do it too.

        In my opinion the time of day they chose to blow them shows they wanted as much collateral damage as they could.

        What’s the advantage of making excuses for committing war crimes?

        • 【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          Is there any time of day it’s not atrocious? Seems like any time would have basically equal risk for collateral casualties.

          To be effective it all had to be at once. It seems that they waited until the pagers were being used to coordinate a fresh wave of rocket attacks with promises of more to come before setting them off.

          • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 years ago

            Because that time of day is when the most people will be out in public. It seems deliberately designed to cause as much damage as widely as possible. Likely to cause fear in the population.

                • 【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  Terrorism is illegitimate. Fear is only a small part of one definition of the term.

                  This was an attack by military on military. They were using the pagers to coordinate the rocket attacks against Israel that they e been launching lately.

                  • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    2 years ago

                    Sorry I was being vague. Its an attack meant to cause terror in the civilian population as well. Its considered indiscriminate because while they knew who had the pagers at a point in time, when they did decide to blow them they couldnt know who would be hurt. In my opinion thats a line too far to cross.

                    It might also have to do with the fact that I consider people who are fighting in their own land to be both civilians and militants. Thats besides the actual civilians, if its even possible to live in some of these areas and truly avoid contact with “bad people”.

                    I don’t buy all this eye for an eye stuff going around, people are shit judges of themselves let alone other people.