GEICO, the second-largest vehicle insurance underwriter in the US, has decided it will no longer cover Tesla Cybertrucks. The company is terminating current Cybertruck policies and says the truck “doesn’t meet our underwriting guidelines.”

  • helenslunch@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Do you really just not understand the difference between an analogy and an equivalency?

    Also your assertion about computation and electricity displays your horrible lack of understanding of the concept of redundancies.

    If you have evidence that there was a complete lack of power to any and all systems, please do present it, but I’m very confident that you don’t, so please come off it.

      • helenslunch@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        16 hours ago

        …yes? Was there something you wanted to add? I can’t see anything in Twitter.

        • Crazyslinkz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          16 hours ago

          I drove it ONE block after delivery, it made a loud thunk, and threw alarms, and was disabled!

          You requested evidence, I was attempting to provide evidence. Copy paste of last line of the Twitter post.

            • Crazyslinkz@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              15 hours ago

              Ok, I missed the word and. My apologies. This is an example of any. I guess it’s not all as the screen still worked. Truck won’t move, but you don’t care about that.

    • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yes, I fully understand the difference between analogy and equivalency. You claimed that fly by wire on an aircraft is exactly as safe and redundant as the steering wheel of a Tesla vehicle. That’s called an equivalency and is a demonstrably false statement. I never claimed that there were no redundancies to the power supplies, but it’s simply not relevant. You do understand that there are different regulations and rigors applied to an aircraft compared to a crappy car that hasn’t even passed any crash safety testing and hasn’t been certified by any engineering standards bodies, right?

      • helenslunch@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        1 day ago

        You claimed that fly by wire on an aircraft is exactly as safe and redundant as the steering wheel of a Tesla vehicle.

        I did not. You just pulled that out of your ass. I don’t have time for bad faith arguments. Good night.

        • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          The only good news here is that the regulators in your country aren’t stupid enough to let you operate this machine near your fellow humans.