Arthur Besse@lemmy.mlM to Linux@lemmy.mlEnglish · edit-27 months agotension on kernel mailing lists continues to grow as a Linux Foundation board member finally replies with a "summary of the legal advice the kernel is operating under" re: enforcing US sanctionslore.kernel.orgexternal-linkmessage-square108fedilinkarrow-up1249arrow-down114
arrow-up1235arrow-down1external-linktension on kernel mailing lists continues to grow as a Linux Foundation board member finally replies with a "summary of the legal advice the kernel is operating under" re: enforcing US sanctionslore.kernel.orgArthur Besse@lemmy.mlM to Linux@lemmy.mlEnglish · edit-27 months agomessage-square108fedilink
minus-squareSeattleRain@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11arrow-down3·6 months agoNext to none. You’re just spreading FUD.
minus-squareSeattleRain@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·6 months agoThey haven’t been involved with that for years and it’s open source so it’s as likely to have a backdoor as any other part of the code.
Next to none. You’re just spreading FUD.
selinux is one example.
They haven’t been involved with that for years and it’s open source so it’s as likely to have a backdoor as any other part of the code.