• Klaymore@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    56
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Wayland all the way, 120 hz Freesync monitor with 60 hz second monitor works perfectly on KDE Plasma with AMD. No fussing about with X11 configs or worrying about if the compositor is active or not, it just works.

  • Yuumi@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    1 year ago

    Don’t bother choosing. Use whatever the distro gives you until you actually have a reason to switch

    • creation7758@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I use arch btw. My distro doesn’t give me anything. I was on x11. Wanted to experiment a bit and now I’m configuring hyprland. Going well for me so far

  • burrito@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Wayland is the future. X11’s future is dead. Unfortunately there are still some growing pains. Xwayland mostly works but I have issues with it sometimes.

  • michaelrose@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    1 year ago

    If you don’t know install a distro and use what comes with it by default and only worry about digging into the plumbing if something doesn’t work for you.

    Ideally you let your distro worry about plumbing.

    I think Mint is nice if you don’t need bleeding edge stuff. You can use Cinnamon which runs x11 but will eventually support Wayland.

    I’ve heard good things about suse which has a rolling release option and supports gnome and KDE under Wayland.

    Arch of course is a thing if you don’t mind a manual transmission as it were.

    Personally I might pick Mint to get started.

    • imnotneo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      hmm interested in the battery life comment. is this a thing? if I could push an extra 20 minutes or so I’d switch

      • bitwolf@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’ve also noticed a dramatic improvement in battery life with wayland. Been using it since F21 it’s very efficient imo

      • Certainity45@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        is this a thing?

        Honestly, I have no clue. With DWM I had like 3-4 hrs at max and now I am using DWL for 6-8 hrs.

        What is also noticeable, is that closing the lid puts the laptop actually into sleep. Because with DWM it continued using the battery as if it was actually used.

        I am not advanced user enough to tell what exactly caused this.

    • jack@monero.town
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      No screen tearing out of the box is a huge plus for wayland. Makes recommending GNU/Linux much easier

  • Presi300@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Wayland, because it’s faster, more stable, handles multi-monitor better, you can have animations while playing a game, no tearing, no fcking around window managers/compositors or shit, lower memory usage and 1:1 touchpad gestures

    • WuTang @lemmy.ninja
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      you have the same with X11… i have all these feats with my intel and AMD GPU.

      So why Wayland then? Better architecture/codebase and more manpower. And I think it supports multi-gpu better, not sure as nvidia doesn’t play well with Wayland, it would be astonish that Optimus works any better.

      • Presi300@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Try running multiple monitors with different resolutions or gaming… Just in general (no seriously, people who think that gaming on X11 is better than wayland are fcking insane… No tearing, having to disable compositor to get more than 20fps, just works) in X, bet you’ll have a great time. And yes, Nvidia is the only reason why imo anyone should still be using X (if they don’t wanna use gnome)

  • Fedora@lemmy.haigner.me
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Wayland. Because it’s X12. Not a spiritual successor to X11, but an implementation of a subset of X12 by the X11 people. The fact that X11 even works for desktop is a miracle, and only possible due to everyone deploying ass-backwards workarounds to make it work. Now the only changes to Xorg are related to Xwayland.

  • Matej@matejc.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Both have issues, just that X11 has old issues that rarely someone is workin on, while Wayland has new ones and people are fixing them. So Wayland for me, thank you.

  • hitagi@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    X11. I heard NVIDIA is buggy on Wayland. Also, I’ve never really had much problems with X11 and my system setup.

    • aikixd@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I found that Wayland works better in my case: XPS 17 with Nvidia on Ubuntu lts. Less stuttering and overall smoother feeling. The only issue is that the screen doesn’t always turns on after suspend, but this is healed with ctrl+f1.

  • deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    X11 for X11Forwarding over SSH.

    Wayland because I want something actively maintained and progressive.

    • Gamey@feddit.rocks
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t think that’s a feature many people actually needed, something like accessability is peobably a better argument but I agree with the fundamental statment

      • deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Agree, network transparency is a super power user feature.

        And frankly VNC is good enough.

        I just found it sad that a really powerful feature was dismissed as “no-one actually wants this” (yes I do) and “just use VNC” (I shouldn’t have to) and “just plug a monitor in” (well yeah).

        I would have hoped that is have been a protocol extension or something rather than outright dismissed as “doing it wrong”.

        • Gamey@feddit.rocks
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          I think thee main reason for some of Waylands feature cuts next to security and legacy stuff no one needs anymore is the unmaintainable giant X11 became but I agree, some sort of reliable way to extend the protocol directly would be cool to have eventually, usually that stuff shouldn’t really be in the protocol itself ether tho!

        • PseudoSpock@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Oh hell no. Vnc isn’t application specific, dynamically resizable, and requires adding that to remote hosts when ssh and x is already there. You know nothing, John Snow.

      • PseudoSpock@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Don’t tell me I don’t need it, I use it every day to run apps not yet available on arm from another system. I’ve used it for years at work, as well. Just because it’s for something other than fricking gamer’s doesn’t mean it is not needed.

        • Gamey@feddit.rocks
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I never claimed you or others don’t need it, just that it’s a featore most people don’t need… Furthermore almost anyone who claims to need it would be totally fine with a implementation outside of the display protocol (E.g. VNC) too so the amount of people who actually need it is extremly small.

  • sashanoraa@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Wayland if possible because it generally performes better and is actively maintained. Xorg if Wayland doesn’t support your system yet.

  • FarLine99@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Wayland. Touchscreen support and gestures. No scaling issues. Better smoothness.

    • MazonnaCara89@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      And don’t forget Crash-Resilient Wayland Compositing that keep applications alive even tho the “compositor” crash, so it does restart without any data loss and the lockscreen protocol, because on xorg if the lockscreen crash then you view the desktop and you have the device unlocked!

    • WuTang @lemmy.ninja
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Wayland. Touchscreen support and gestures. No scaling issues. Better smoothness.

      touchscreen and gestures are managed by libinput/evdev which are independant and works with X11, using it currently on my Yoga C340.

      • FarLine99@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Good point. But I think it would be difficult to configure this bundle within GNOME/KDE. And it’s not necessary. Almost everything works fine under Wayland right now.