Google confirms its latest update can scan all your photos to “use actual images of you and your loved ones” in AI image generation. That means Gemini seeing who you know and what you do. You likely have tens or hundreds of thousands of photos. They’re all exposed if you update.

  • lostoncalantha@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    4 days ago

    GrapheneOS works great for me. Not a lot you can do on stock android that you can’t do on GrapheneOS. I would highly recommend anyone looking for privacy to look into it. Very very easy to install. Just make sure you have a Pixel phone that is unlocked. I’ve been using it as my daily driver for two years now.

    • xthexder@l.sw0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 days ago

      GrapheneOS isn’t a replacement for Google Photos though? What do you use for photo backups? (Immich seems like the obvious answer, but I’d like to know if there’s more options out there)

      • snrkl@lemmus.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        3 days ago

        It let’s you run Google Photos without network permissions and with storage scopes limiting it to certain folders.

        • xthexder@l.sw0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          Does the photo search still work offline? It doesn’t for me. That seems like it’d be the only reason to stick with that app if you’re not using the cloud storage, otherwise I might as well just use a basic file browser.

          • snrkl@lemmus.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            I don’t upload my photos to the cloud, and don’t use the search function. It’s just a photo library app on the phone. It seems to do a better job of post processing the pics from my Pixel, which is why in use it.

          • ramenshaman@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            I use google photos to pull up old pics that have already been uploaded for a long time. Google photos requires you to share your entire library otherwise it doesn’t let you view photos from the cloud, but GOS let’s you tell google photos that you’re sharing your whole library when you actually aren’t. Google doesn’t have access to any of my new pics but I can still view all my old stuff.

    • steel_for_humans@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      My only issue is with banking apps and our national ID app which is very useful. I know some work, but I haven’t seen all that I have listed, so I would have to be the guinea pig :) I actually have an older Pixel phone with a shattered screen, I was planning to have it repaired, so I guess that’s where I can test GrapheneOS safely.

    • qaeta@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      3 days ago

      It’s so easy to install! You just need to be in the 3% of smartphone owners who actually have one! EASY!

      rolls eyes

        • qaeta@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Cool, I have a Samsung S23fe, please feel free to install it for me. I’ll wait.

          Admittedly, being facetious there, but my point is that if it requires a specific device that most people don’t have to install, then it is not easy to install for most people, because it literally cannot be.

            • qaeta@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 hours ago

              … what exactly do you think the phase “impossibly difficult” means? Because “impossible” is a level of difficulty ie. THEY ARE NOT DIFFERENT THINGS

              • DisgruntledGorillaGang@reddthat.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 hours ago

                Impossibly difficult is an oxymoron. If something is impossible, it can’t be difficult because if it is difficult that means its very hard to achieve but still possible. If something is impossible, that means you cannot do it, full stop. It is not possible. Those are two completely different things.

        • qaeta@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          My point is that if it requires a specific device that most people don’t have to install, then it is not easy to install for most people, because it literally cannot be.

          • Blander_Rurton@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            But it’s not for most people. It’s for Google pixel users, that’s the whole point! That’s like saying oh this diesel sucks and isn’t user friendly because it doesn’t work in my petrol car. That’s because it isn’t for your car.

            • qaeta@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 hours ago

              Then don’t recommend it for people that can’t use it, JFC.

              • Blander_Rurton@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                5 hours ago

                No one is doing that. YOU’RE the one here that is getting angry at nothing. It’s just an option for pixel users, who are one of the only demographics locked into Google photos. Other phone users are free to use their stock photo app. You’ve clearly just misunderstood the original comment and are trying to save face.