Lee Duna@lemmy.nz to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agoMicrosoft Teams users are extremely angry at new banner asking them to paywww.neowin.netexternal-linkmessage-square148linkfedilinkarrow-up1598arrow-down16
arrow-up1592arrow-down1external-linkMicrosoft Teams users are extremely angry at new banner asking them to paywww.neowin.netLee Duna@lemmy.nz to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square148linkfedilink
minus-squareCanIFishHere@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down3·2 months agoWhat was your Boss’ feedback? Why didn’t he/she like your recommendation? I’m going to guess a major constraint was too many sources for software.
minus-squareLordCrom@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 months agoBasically, if they went with IBM and it broke, its IBM’s fault If they went open source and it broke, its our fault for picking it.
minus-squareCanIFishHere@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 months agoLiability for one’s product actually means something to IBM/Microsoft/etc. instead of some guy on github.
minus-squareGirthBrooksPLO@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 months agoI mean, they are probably running RedHat or Debian on their servers anyway, so if it’s reliable enough for them, then it’s reliable enough for clients.
What was your Boss’ feedback? Why didn’t he/she like your recommendation? I’m going to guess a major constraint was too many sources for software.
Basically, if they went with IBM and it broke, its IBM’s fault
If they went open source and it broke, its our fault for picking it.
Liability for one’s product actually means something to IBM/Microsoft/etc. instead of some guy on github.
I mean, they are probably running RedHat or Debian on their servers anyway, so if it’s reliable enough for them, then it’s reliable enough for clients.