A Google Gemini-powered AI agent was given free rein to run a coffee shop in Sweden, and is quickly burning through its budget.

  • frongt@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    93
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    café barista Kajetan Grzelczak sees it differently. “All the workers are pretty much safe,” he told the AP. “The ones who should be worried about their employment are the middle bosses, the people in management.”

    This shows that AI can’t do that job either.

    • MIDItheKID@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      16 hours ago

      They said the dystopian part out loud.

      I love to shit on middle management as much as anybody else, but good managers are great. My manager worked his way up as a systems architect. He’s incredibly smart, very friendly, and always has my back.

      What getting rid of middle management does is build a solid wall between the workers and the upper class. There’s no corporate ladder to climb. If you start at the bottom, you stay at the bottom. The people on top hire their buddies and other people in their class. This is like a drone strike on the shrinking middle class.

      • badgermurphy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        12 hours ago

        I’d be more afraid of losing that ladder if it were not already absent. Upward mobility in my country, at least, has essentially become a fiction.

    • 13igTyme@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      24 hours ago

      I wonder if AI would actually be good at replacing CEO and other C-suite positions, but was trained in such a way to purposely not be good at replacing a CEO because tech CEOs are the ones in control of this bubble.

      • michaelmrose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Tells me you’ve never used it and had it deliver extremely convincing analysis which turns out to be pants on head stupid when you dig into the nitty gritty. It is only useful if you can continually watch its output and make it redo anything that is nonsense and no the AI can’t watch itself. It will happily confirm that its nonsense is great. It needs either manual and continual analysis or guardrails that tell it when its wrong… It’s why it can be used for software because tests and error messages can catch it fucking up. Real life lacks such affordances.

        • 13igTyme@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          21 hours ago

          I’ve used AI for work. We have something built based on claude. I only use it for finding particular lines of code, finding datadog logs, maybe identifying bugs, and finding old Jiras. It basically just saves time then the rest I do myself or work with engineering.

          Your comment tells me you never worked with someone in the C-suite before. Most Chief level positions will happily confirm their nonsense is great.

    • AskMeForADickPic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      24 hours ago

      Yes but it is training from this and as a result should get better. Ai was bad at everything until it stole the Internet and used it for training.

      • teyrnon@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        23 hours ago

        It’s an llm though, not really ai, and it hasn’t really gotten “better,” than automated programs to make decisions based on metrics, which would outperform llm’s as a ceo.

      • Jesus_666@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        23 hours ago

        Mind you, stealing the internet worked because they effectively had the sum total of human knowledge as a training set. I don’t think that there’s nearly as much detailed data on the minutiae of running a business.

      • atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        23 hours ago

        There is no model that can be trained in real time currently, and one instance isn’t going to offer anything to the model as far as new training data goes.