vegeta@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 days agoDEF CON bans Meta-style 'pervert glasses'www.theregister.comexternal-linkmessage-square144linkfedilinkarrow-up11.01Karrow-down111
arrow-up11Karrow-down1external-linkDEF CON bans Meta-style 'pervert glasses'www.theregister.comvegeta@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 days agomessage-square144linkfedilink
minus-squareLudrol@szmer.infolinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up14·2 days agoHuman eyes are also sensitive to high intensity IR and UV light so you will also blind a human wearing them. Depending on the wavelength, permanently.
minus-squareGodric@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·2 days agoI’m already in favor of using high-powered lasers, you don’t have to keep convincing me
minus-squarenonentity@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·2 days agoI meant to include ‘strobe’ in the definition. A low duty cycle would cut down on the biological impact, and rapid, random cycling would help blind the sensors as they try to compensate.
minus-squaremuusemuuse@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down3·1 day agoSo what? They were okay with wearing glasses anyway.
minus-squareoyzmo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 days agoLidar would probably do the trick
Human eyes are also sensitive to high intensity IR and UV light so you will also blind a human wearing them. Depending on the wavelength, permanently.
I’m already in favor of using high-powered lasers, you don’t have to keep convincing me
I meant to include ‘strobe’ in the definition. A low duty cycle would cut down on the biological impact, and rapid, random cycling would help blind the sensors as they try to compensate.
So what? They were okay with wearing glasses anyway.
Lidar would probably do the trick