• AItoothbrush@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Are they actually upstreaming anything or just “debian and ubuntu support™” where its just two random images they supply like sbc manufacturers usually do?

  • Quazatron@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Qualcomm wants a piece of Nvidia’s server market pie.

    I expect the “support” is to ship some binary blobs in a open source wrapper at most, like Nvidia does.

  • adr1an@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    19 hours ago

    As much as I welcome this I can’t help but wonder, why do they care?

    Is it because it was the year of the Linux desktop? ;D

    • TobuscusLover2001@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Same reason NVIDIA finally started prioritising open source drivers for linux all of a sudden… Its AI :/. The laptops are even called copilot+ PCs. They wanna make AI dev for those data centers that keep popping up as easy as possible. Thats literally the only reason.

    • undu@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      19 hours ago

      If I had to guess, it would be to have an easier time getting intoe the server market.

      Being able to develop on the same platform as the one that a program is deployed to usually allows for much lower friction and faster development cycles.

      It can also be used to ramp up collaboration with the Linux project, which is useful for getting patches upstreames promptly.

    • RelativeArea1@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      16 hours ago

      AI, same thing why nvidia kinda went a bit loosy with their drivers on linux, windows is too limiting and freeBSD is apple’s main bitch.

      • furry toaster@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        apple has nevee meaningfully contributed to BSDs, they are just a disgusting leech, the reason why FreeBSD isnt as big is simply because Linux won the Unix wars that strongly

      • chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 hours ago

        How do you figure FreeBSD is influenced by Apple? macOS and iOS don’t use FreeBSD. They use Darwin, which is a BSD fork, but not related to FreeBSD at all AFAIK besides they have some of the userland tools.

  • utopiah@lemmy.world
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Late indeed but with the Frame already shipped running Arch and KDE on a Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 it’s definitely going to be interesting.

  • dudeface@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    19 hours ago

    I was interested years ago potentially of a tablet form factor as a nice travel device

    Don’t think I care anymore