• geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 hours ago

    This is the exact opposite. Trying to ban AI from everything despite its use cases.

    Many people don’t know this but even Luddites didn’t oppose machinery. They simply opposed the ownership structure of it. So instead of saying “no LLM” you could say “Open-source/weight LLM’s allowed only”.

    • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      60 minutes ago

      This is the exact opposite. Trying to ban AI from everything despite its use cases.

      This is a pure, bold-faced lie. But this is nothing new from AI evangelists.

      This is about banning AI contributions from specific open-sourced projects. This is due to a number of legitimate concerns that are still not solved, such as maintainability and how AI development legally interacts with licenses such as the GPL

      You want to go and start an open sourced project that uses AI from the start? Go ahead, nothing is stopping you. You want to install AI programs on your OS? Go ahead, nobody is stopping you

      But don’t cram that bullshit into the OS itself. Doing so then forces AI onto everybody whether they want it or not, and that’s bullshit