Age verification proposals are often presented as a simple tradeoff: sacrifice a little privacy to better safeguard children online. But that framing overlooks a more fundamental question. What happens to people who cannot verify their age at all? This is particularly a problem when users are required to prove their age with identity documents.

  • Maeve@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    1 day ago

    Age verification laws reshape who can speak, who can access information, and who gets excluded from the digital public sphere. In other words, age verification is not a neutral safety measure: it presents a structural barrier to disproportionately exclude certain groups—particularly those in the global majority—and alters the architecture of global online expression. Some of these groups are already marginalized offline, and age verification extends that exclusion into digital spaces.

    For instance, 850 million people globally do not have ID. Most of these individuals exist in primarily low and middle income countries in Sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia. The World Bank points out that many are members of marginalized groups and more than half of those lacking access to identity documentation also have children whose births have not been registered. Women are particularly vulnerable and are 8% less likely than men to have an ID. Other vulnerable groups, such as adults in low income countries, are less likely to have an ID when they fall below 25 years, as are those with a primary school education or less or those in rural areas.

    • gandalfthewhite@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      15 hours ago

      It’s very telling that these “humanitarian” globalist groups consider people not having documents and papers some problem that needs to be solved when it’s really just about their desire for total control and domination. People are not meant to be tied to certificates and IDs and the idea that they are is born from an absolute lust for control by the ‘system managers’ and nothing more.