TLDR: Which distro is better for gaming and video editing (NVIDIA GPU), CachyOS or Ubuntu?

Hi! It’s been probably a month since I started using Linux (escaping from Windows), and I choose LMDE since the distro that I felt aligned more with what I want from a distro on in general is Debian, but since it was my first time using Linux on my main device (just tried Debian on a laptop to run a Homelab) I got recommended Mint to make it easier for me to adapt. The thing is that since I started using LMDE I’ve discovered that it doesn’t cover perfectly my needs. Two things that I didn’t want to lose when switching to Linux were gaming and the ability to run video/audio/photo editing programs flawlessly, mainly DaVinci Resolve and AffinityPhoto. It’s been practically impossible to achieve that, since DaVinci doesn’t work, can’t even get to install AffinityPhoto and some videogames need more recent (NVIDIA) drivers than what Debian and of course LMDE can offer. So, seeing that I want to keep LMDE (and maybe in the future upgrade from LMDE to Debian) but at the same time I’m not willing to give up on those 2 things, I believe the dual-boot option is the one that suits me the most. Now, what I’m here for. I’ve been doing some research and the ones that caught my atention the most were CachyOS and Ubuntu:

  • CachyOS: PROS: · High gaming performance and (looks like) compatibility. · Looks like DaVinci works perfectly for a lot of people (although some other people claim having issues). CONS: · Sounds too complex as a distro for someone who has close to zero programming knowledge and just started using Linux. · The rolling release aspect feels a little scary too.

  • Ubuntu: PROS: · May not be THE gaming distro but it seems to be working for a lot of people without having extensive programming or Linux knowledge. · Generally may be more compatible and stable than CachyOS in general · Seems it will be easier for me to adapt to since it’s Debian-based. CONS: · Doesn’t seem as good as CachyOS on a performance standpoint, affecting both video editing and gaming capabilities.

Now, my questions would be: Am I mistaken in any of the info I have revolving these two distros? Could I be missing any other options? Which do you think is the distro that could suit me the most? Any recommendation when doing the Dual-boot? I have never done it and it scares me a little tbh.

My main priority is having a stable (and compatible in the first place, of course) experience (maybe Ubuntu?), but I don’t mind having to put more work into it to achieve a better experience (maybe CachyOS?).

I would love to hear from you and, of course, if I’m missing any relevant information I’ll be more than happy to share it too.

Thank you very much! :D

  • DrunkenDuckling@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    Between these two, Cachy.

    If choice is open: Fedora.

    “Gaming” focussed distros are often a worse choice imo, because they offer zero performance benefit, are bloated in an attempt to bundle drivers out of the box, are harder to troubleshoot because worse documentation, and the preinstalled configs can cause headaches.

  • LewdLemon@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 hours ago

    If you war a good first Linux experience, stick with anything Ubuntu-/Debian-based; they are

    • stable workhorses, i.e. they don’t break on you as easily as rolling release distros like CachyOS.
    • wildly popular, i.e. you’ll find plenty of resources to help you get started (although, to be fair, the Arch wiki is also ridiculously detailed).

    Whatever you do, steer clear of immutable distros like Bazzite for now. As cool as the concept is (I run Bazzite on my gaming machine) - as soon as you do something “non-standard” (and modding your Minecraft .jar with Optifine already qualifies as such), you’ll have to fiddle with the terminal and distrobox containers, both of which will be alien concepts for you at the start and may be top much to make it a good first impression.

  • HaraldvonBlauzahn@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Caution, dual-boot means you have to power down your system before you can start the other, if you share any file systems. Hibernate and then booting another distro will result in file system damage.

    The alternative would be a virtual machine.

    It can also occasionally mess up the grub configuration, which means you have to reinstall grub.

  • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Seeing as you have an Nvidia card, I’d caution against Ubuntu. People talk about how “stable” it is, but it’ll break on it’s own even if you don’t try to update it, and it’s all because of Nvidia drivers.

    I recommend getting a distro that has the Nvidia drivers baked it, which mostly narrows it down to Bazzite, Nobara, CachyOS, or Pop!OS.

    I’m personally not a fan of Pop! since it’s based on Debian.

    I personally use Nobara right now since it’s essentially Bazzite if it weren’t immutable. It’s OK. It does some things well and has some headaches.

    I recently had to dual-boot CachyOS alongside Nobara. I haven’t had much time to tinker with it, but it’s definitely different. But one big benefit to Cachy is that you can pick whatever desktop environment and bootloaders you want. Just pick the correspondjng option in the installer.

    At the end of the day, Bazzit, Nobara, and Cachy all have the same gaming-focusses system optimizations. It just boils down to specifics from there

  • mbp@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Might just be my old experience (happy to learn otherwise) but dual booting ended up with more of a painful experience than not. When Windows would update, it would fuck my grub up and cause issues booting into Linux and Windows. You can fix it (most of the time) but expect to do it rather often; especially unpleasant as a beginner.

    I know there’s issues with GPU passthrough on vms but IDK if dual booting is the moves unless they seriously improved the experience in the last couple years.

  • mrnngglry@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    11 hours ago

    I’m not a programmer either. Never have been. You don’t need to be one to use any desktop distro. You’d be fine with CachyOS. It is popular enough that getting help with anything that does pop up should be easy. I’ve used it as well as Nobara and Bazzite. Ultimately, I landed on Bazzite. That was about a year ago and I am happy.

  • [object Object]@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I would throw bazzite in as an option, especially for a new user.

    Bazzite has a good out of the box experience, is meant for gaming, and it uses an immutable distro.

    In my opinion the only reason people don’t like immutable distros is bad habits that are hard to break, or wanting highly custom system configurations, both do not apply to a new user. If you never go into the terminal there’s no difference, and if you do a system like brew works pretty well.

    The advantage of an immutable system are that you can’t mess up your system and it’s more secure. It also stops you from doing dangerous things or leasing habits that require modifying system packages without knowing what they do.

    For just gaming and desktop use (with KDE), it’s a good low maintenance system.

  • sicktriple@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    13 hours ago

    IMO Fedora can do everything that Ubuntu does, without snap or the opinionated Cannonical stuff, it’s an easy GUI installer, has better defaults (except you need to manually add non-fre repos, trivial), and wide software compatibility. You can’t go wrong with Fedora unless you specifically hate having up to date software or major updates every 6-12 months.

    Cachy is a fine distro too I guess. I’d probably use EndeavorOS instead. Any distro with a relatively recent graphics stack is going to game the same. The other stuff around the margins is going to be more important than the 2% optimization you get from Cachy’s kernel, and cachyos-proton can be run on steam in any distro.

    • Culminate@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 hours ago

      As a Debian user and programmer, I also suggest Fedora. As said above, Fedora has everything that Ubuntu does, does not force snap packs on its users, and finally, it offers updated software libraries compared to more stable distros such as Debian.

      • phanto@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        I landed on Fedora Gnome as my default choice unless I have a reason to go other. My wife finally stuck with Linux after trying Mint, Ubuntu, Pop, and Ubuntu Mate, then landing on Fedora KDE. (When I say trying, I mean me trying to get her to use it and then her abandoning the machine for Windows.) Fedora KDE stuck.

    • Well1@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Seeing that I’m getting closer to Cachy than Ubuntu, I’ll check Endeavor, which I don’t I had heard of yet. I’ll test Fedora too just in case. Thanks!

      • muhyb@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Note that, EndeavourOS is stock Arch with a GUI installer, if you don’t mind theming which is optional. CachyOS is a tailored Arch so it would probably be easier for you.

        • sicktriple@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          12 hours ago

          To be fair, there isn’t really a such thing as “stock” Arch. You would just have the base and linux linux-firmware packages. EOS gives you a minimal, but entirely functional desktop experience with as few assumptions possible, which is nice for someone who wants to tailor their desktop to their liking. You are correct, cachy would probably be easier, but I don’t think EOS is particularly hard. Either way, gaming is just a matter of installing steam.

          • muhyb@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            12 hours ago

            Well, technically that’s true but figure of speech. :)

            EOS is one of my most used distros to this day and I agree it’s one of the best minimalist distros with a GUI installer out there. It gives you nice defaults and cover almost everything out of the box. However OP is new in Linux world and in my opinion they shouldn’t use Arch at all for the transition period (though that part completely depends on the person). But Cachy has many tools pre-installed comparing to EOS so that’s why it would be easier.

  • DonutsRMeh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    15 hours ago

    CachyOS or Ubuntu?

    With all due respect to Ubuntu, but this isn’t even a comparison. I’d try to give you a fair answer if you’d stated Garuda, for example, or Nobara, or Bazzite instead of Ubuntu, because these distros actually put in an effort for gaming specifically, but Ubuntu? It’s a workstation distro and it’s gaming performance is basically whatever the default is on “Linux” as a whole.

    I have personally been using CachyOS for over two years now and I’ve been very happy with it. Their installer recognizes your gpu automatically and installs the right drivers for you.

    Not to take away from the other ones, I’m sure they have amazing work/performance, too, but this is my experience because I’ve tried all of the distros I’ve mentioned above and CachyOS was the best for me personally.

    Your mileage may vary of course. The best thing to do is try different distros and find out for yourself. Make sure your data is backed up while you hop between them until you chose one.

    • Fecundpossum@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Big second for CachyOS.

      I distro hop a fair bit but I keep coming back to Cachy. Personally, I choose to manage and maintain my machine entirely through the terminal, but with Shelly (the GUI package manager CachyOS ships with) and their built in updater, you could probably do all of your basic gaming and video editing for years without ever having to launch a terminal.

      Also, snapper backups functional out of the box. Something breaks? Just pick the most recent snapper image in the boot menu, and hold off on updating for a few days.

      On that note, Cachy slows their update releases a little more than Arch, so while it’s still bleeding edge, there’s still a little buffer time for stability sake, same with EndeavourOS, another great arch based distro.

      Ubuntu has its merits. It’s simple and it generally just works, but Cachy is not nearly difficult enough to pass on.

      • Well1@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        13 hours ago

        That sounds very good and gives me hope hahah. I’ll have it in mind. Thank youu

    • Well1@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Compared to other distros, do you feel it’s been tougher to maintain everything stable enough to not go crazy? Thanks!

      • DonutsRMeh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        12 hours ago

        I haven’t had any major breakages with it beside that one time over a year ago where grub shit the bed and I had to reinstall it from a live environment. Then switched to limine and haven’t had a single issue like that ever since.

  • fozid@lem.radiantfig.fyi
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    You’re not me. You will have different tastes too me. No point you using the distros I like. Do what everybody else does, experiment, try a few, read about them. The are loads out there all with little quirks and differences. Try L/K/X/Ubuntu, try cachyos / arch, try void, try Gentoo, try popos… Have a look at distrowatch for loads of inspiration.

    Any and all distros can use and run any software any other distro runs so they can all do the same stuff, just they all get there in slightly different ways.

        • dusk@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Agreed, distro hopping is the best way to find what you like, and learn along the way, but if a distro isn’t easy to install, it isn’t for newbies, or for me a few years in.

    • Maya S. Trojan@piefed.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Possibly the best advice here re: the distro.

      While it helps to have people give you suggestions, the person who it really needs to work for is you, the user. Don’t let popular opinion turn you away from what works for you, OP. Experiment and play. It costs nothing to put on a new system except some time and effort.

      Also, if you put your home/ directory on its own partition, you can experiment with variations of the same types, like the all the variations of Ubuntu. I’m pretty sure modern installers even back up the dotfiles that exist in your current home/ directory for you, so you don’t even have to worry about old dotfiles breaking anything.

      • Well1@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Thanks for your kind advice :D Though I didn’t get the half of what you said in the last paragraph hahahah. Guess it shows I wasn’t lying when I said I’m new xd

        • Maya S. Trojan@piefed.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          8 hours ago

          okay, well, your root directory is always / that’s where your system stuff lives like /usr/ /bin/ /etc/ et cetera. however, you also have in there alongside the system stuff a /home/ directory, which is where your user data lives. Think of /home/ as your C:\Users\ folder. It’s where whatever your username and its data is is going to live.

          The thing is, when installing the OS, you can choose to set up (manually) to have your /home/ directory on another disk or disk partition, which separates it from the root / directory psychically or logically respectively.

          It would be like if you could re-install windows entirely but never lose your C:\Users\ folder because it actually lived at D:\Users\ and Windows just always looked for your users folder upon install (which Ubuntu does) and allows you to re-use it if it finds it.

          So:\ / = C:\
          /home/ = C:\Users\

          These aren’t 1 to 1 matches in terms of analogy, but it’s pretty close.

          • dusk@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 hours ago

            Even when I was back on windows, my data was always stored on a separate physical drive, I do the same now on linux, and will never understand why anyone would choose to store the 2 on the same drive (unless they only have 1 drive).

            I didn’t use ‘my documents’ and I don’t use ‘home’ either. No doubt there are some benefits to doing so though.

    • adr1an@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      +1 for bazzite because of their inmutable root partition. This should be the way for both beginners and professionals (e.g. adding rootless quadlet for local searxng)

  • Creat@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    12 hours ago

    This isn’t an important choice. If you don’t like the distro or you are having issues, it’s like 10 minutes to switch to a different one.

    That being said, I would not recommend Ubuntu for a variety of reasons. CachyOS is a great option, but there are others. Just try it, if you have issues or don’t like it, try something else.

  • bigfish@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Go Nobara. It just works, with hardly any configuration needed, and is kept remarkably up to date with its updater alone.