53% vs 40% is a pretty striking difference, should we ignore that?
Would the survey have been better if the organizers had collected zero demographic information on respondents, instead of “bringing gender into the conversation?”
I must have missed the part where they said “men bad.” Isn’t that a conclusion you’re drawing?
I must have missed the part where they said “men bad.” Isn’t that a conclusion you’re drawing?
I mean, the article ends with the following paragraph
“Besides pretending they were knowledgeable, men were also more optimistic about AI, the survey showed — while women were more concerned and worried. Ignorance, as they say, is bliss.”
That’s a pretty negatively loaded towards male ending to the whole thing I would say.
53% vs 40% is a pretty striking difference, should we ignore that?
Would the survey have been better if the organizers had collected zero demographic information on respondents, instead of “bringing gender into the conversation?”
I must have missed the part where they said “men bad.” Isn’t that a conclusion you’re drawing?
I mean, the article ends with the following paragraph
That’s a pretty negatively loaded towards male ending to the whole thing I would say.