• Quazatron@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    You can measure their despair level by counting the number of “OpenAI says” articles per week.

  • very_well_lost@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    8 hours ago

    OpenAI says

    I literally cannot think of another company I trust less to say anything useful, interesting or true.

  • terraborra@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    14 hours ago

    OpenAI said On Tuesday a ​GPT-6.1 Sol agent working on an internal testing task on October 3 suppressed automatic ‌security ⁠alerts after deciding an earlier instruction not to send Slack messages also covered safety notifications

    That is not the same as deliberately “weakening” monitoring. They just prompted it wrong.

    • Seralth@piefed.seralth.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      56 minutes ago

      Considering how all the big models basically want to shove verbose notes, extreme levels of logging, multiple layers of back ups, and spam notifications.

      WITH AGGRESSION.

      the fact they managed to get it to surprise anything. Isn’t even just bad promoting.

      They would have had to explicitly tell it to do this AND put in extra leg work to make it stick.

    • RumRunningDevil@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 hours ago

      If that’s the case, at what point do we acknowledge that people don’t seem to be able to reliably prompt “correctly” and even when they do bots disregard instructions as there context window fills?