• ramble81@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    3 days ago

    Honestly the sooner we have fully autonomous cars the better. This growing pain in the worst part but think about things

    • The ability to watch TV, eat, read, nap, work in your car if you want while it drives you places
    • a safer experience due to faster reaction times
    • less traffic jams and slow downs due to more coordinated timing
    • better independence for the infirm and elderly (this is one I think a lot of people overlook)

    Too many people are still scared at this point but overall this would be a positive step for societies. I know there are negatives (car could repossess itself or it could cart me off to jail) but we can’t always fall in the trap of “it has to be 100% right”.

    • s1ndr0m3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Or maybe we could put all that effort into public transit? I lived in Germany for a few years. I did have a car, but I rarely ever used it. I could take a bus to most places in town, including the train station. Most downtown areas were pedestrian traffic only and it was very nice. Now that I live back in the US, I spend so much time in traffic. Their is always construction to make the roads bigger for all the cars. But it never seems to be enough. The whole thing feels like an expensive mess. I don’t think self-driving cars will fix enough of the problems with cars.

    • sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 days ago

      Why stop dreaming there? We could have functional transit and citie streets you could walk and play in if the cars weren’t there.

    • setVeryLoud(true);@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Yeah it’s called a rail. We inexplicably paved over them in the 60’s.

      I get a glimpse of what once was every time they tear open the road. :(

    • P03 Locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Yeah, and with the state of cybersecurity, we can regularly experience the beginning of that movie Upgrade!

    • setVeryLoud(true);@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      The entire rhetoric relies on the idea that self driving road cars are

      1. Feasible
      2. Desirable over rail or bus

      Tesla’s failed efforts have proven time and time again that the road is full of unexpected and arbitrary inaccuracies, ambiguities and risks that cannot be assessed by a machine alone. They’ve also been sued in multiple markets on claims of false advertising because autopilot is not, in fact, autopilot.

      They don’t even have the best system in the industry, that would be Drive Pilot, a Level 3 autonomous assist system by Mercedes-Benz. The only systems to have level 4 are taxis that only operate in limited areas, on limited, known routes, and they are well known for being very easily confused and blocking emergency vehicles.

      • P03 Locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        The only systems to have level 4 are taxis that only operate in limited areas, on limited, known routes, and they are well known for being very easily confused and blocking emergency vehicles.

        Even then, they have overrides for human operators when they fuck up. Driverless cars, my ass.

      • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        Tesla is far from the only player - they’re just the loudest, and sadly the most embarrassing. Waymo and Zoox, for example, are demonstrating its real feasibility.

        • setVeryLoud(true);@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          To be fair, I’ve never stepped into a Waymo, but from what I’ve heard they’re sent on pre-determined paths around a delimited area. These only seem to be feasible you can either strictly control your environment or adjust for a finite number of cases, such as a delimited area, and even that isn’t working too hot for other road users.

          I still don’t see the advantage versus a taxi bus.

          • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            The “delimited area” comprises entire cities, and they are not following predetermined paths, except in the sense that they only follow mapped roads. And the entire point is to share the road with human drivers.

            Taxi buses do not operate on-demand.

    • thejml@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      As someone who deals with IT and cybersecurity (and traffic) as part of my daily job, I will happily sit in traffic to actually own and have control over my vehicle.

    • chilicheeselies@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Not worth the instability on society from the job loss. Also claims like faster traction times are questionable.

      Personally, I don’t want a computer making life or death decisions in the heat of the moment

    • melfie@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Autonomous cars sound cool in theory, but I’m a techbro-phobe.