• Mongostein@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      It’s an ouroboros of shit, but it can’t even eat its own tail because it’s pumping out so much shit that it’s somehow getting larger!

    • 🌞 Alexander Daychilde 🌞@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      What percentage of “user”-generated content on Reddit is slop now?

      I know it’s not a popular opinion, but very little of it is.

      I’m not saying there’s none - not saying that at all - but as far as your average thread where everyone is posting about all the other comments being AI generated… it’s very tedious and obviously untrue.

      • Natanael@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        If you have one well moderated forum for normal users and a shit one nobody goes to, the bots will show up at the latter.

        If the AI review function doesn’t tell the difference, the bombardment of fakes in the second will tilt review summaries significantly

        • Baldur@normals.me
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          This matches what I see from the mod side. Bots go where moderation is cheap. The only thing that has worked for me is making every removal public with a reason and letting anyone promote their own product openly with a label and a cooldown. When promotion is allowed in the open, there’s much less reason to fake it.