OpenAI’s ChatGPT and Sam Altman are in massive trouble. OpenAI is getting sued in the US for illegally using content from the internet to train their LLM or large language models

  • jambalaya@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Just because the data is “public” doesn’t mean it was intended to be used in this manner. Some of the data was even explicitly protected by gpl licensing or similar.

    • tallwookie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      but GPL licensing indicates that “If code was put in the public domain by its developer, it is in the public domain no matter where it has been” - so, likewise for data. if anyone has a case against OpenAI, it’d be whatever platforms they scraped - and ultimately those platforms would open their own, individual lawsuits.

          • Wander@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            If you release code under gpl, and I modify it, I’m required to release those modifications publicly under gpl as well.

            • inspxtr@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              so if content is under GPL and used for training data, how far is the process of training/fine-tuning considered “modification”? For example, if I scrape a bunch of blog posts and just try to use tools to analyze the language, does that considered “modification”? What is the minimum solution that OpenAI should do (or should have done) here, does it stop at making the code for processing the data public, or the entire code base?