• lautan@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    46
    ·
    6 months ago

    From what I know, certain special interests want TikTok under their control so they can censor certain topics. People keep saying this is happening because of CCP, etc. But I believe they want this platform “censored” before the elections. The other major players already play ball with censorship but TikTok caught them by surprise.

    • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      Why would it have unanimous bi-partisan support in the Senate if the bill had weight on the election results?

      • bassomitron@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        6 months ago

        To be devil’s advocate: We already know China loves to be meddlin’ in Western elections, so both parties have a vested interest in getting them out of their pants.

        That being said, China can easily meddle all over the place, so I don’t consider that the primary motivator. Like I said before, this is 98% about protectionism.

        • thanks_shakey_snake@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          6 months ago

          TikTok is a massively powerful tool of influence and intelligence, in the hands of an adversary that is well understood to proactively meddle with democratic elections.

          Yes, obviously the CCP will unabashedly pursue other interference vectors. That should be viewed as more reason to curtail TikTok, not less.

          • bassomitron@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            You’re missing the point, though. China has sizable stakes in multiple social media and streaming platforms, movie studios, and popular videogame studios (like the makers of Fortnite). But the fact those are all primarily owned by US companies makes it okay (in this context–I know China has stakes in similar businesses around the world, too).

            TikTok is a threat to Meta and Co’s dominance and American companies can’t simply buy it out to make it go away or at least make it directly benefit them. Don’t mistake me in saying it isn’t a national security threat. What I’m saying is, if TikTok is a threat, then all of these corporate platforms are a threat. The government should targeting all of them! But they’re not, and the reason seems pretty obvious to me.

            • thanks_shakey_snake@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              I mean do you think Fortnite has anywhere near the same level of ability to disseminate information or surveil people as TikTok does?

              And actually it makes a material difference that ByteDance is based in Beijing, as opposed to just having Chinese investors. Those social platforms, movie studios, etc., being headquartered in the US is exactly what makes it different. Can Chinese firms apply financial pressure to compel them to act against the interests of US citizens? Yes, of course, and they do.

              But that’s categorically different than being legally obligated to comply with the CCP, which ByteDance is.

              • bassomitron@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                6 months ago

                You’re also missing my original point. The argument that Congress is making is that TikTok is a dire threat to national security because: a) it’s entirelt owned by a Chinese company, b) it is egregiously invasive, spying on its users and logging the data, c) it’s very addictive, and d) it’s algorithms are so effective that it’s capable of mass targeted propaganda distribution that can impact elections, radicalize, etc.

                Please, tell me how that is different than YouTube, Facebook, etc. other than the core ownership? We have literal fucking proof that Facebook collaborated with foreign agents in 2016 to influence our elections, for fuck’s sake! And Congress did nothing to them besides a half-assed Q&A session with Zuckerberg and Co! But nope, TikTok is entirely about ethics and a sense of patriotic duty to keep our country safe, not about money and protectionism at all. Don’t get me wrong, I’m sure there are some politicians who are genuinely trying to protect the US. Some. But the rest couldn’t give a shit if a literal foreign plant was running our country.

                And yes, I realize Fortnite and TikTok are different. But it doesn’t take a genius to see a pattern in Tencent buying as much stake as possible in every major trending Western company. It’s pretty obvious that they’re buying influence and power vs caring about just profits, similar to China’s whole silk road or whatever the fuck they call that program that lets poor countries borrow money. TikTok is a drop in the bucket when you consider how beholden we are to China in so many other far more immediately dire areas, e.g. critical medicine and medical supplies, critical technology components, etc etc.

        • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          6 months ago

          They have until January 19th to divest, with a 90-day extension if they are pursuing sale. They aren’t mandating that it be done by November’s election regardless of the outcome.

          • bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            6 months ago

            Seriously, going through these comments, it’s clear most people didn’t read the article or didn’t learn how calendars work in school (or are part of the Russian Internet Research Agency and trying to sow doubt in Biden).

            Based on the timeline, it’s clear the intention wasn’t to protect against the 2024 election, since the potential ban would go in place after the election happens.

            • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              Exactly. It has no bearing on the election, and Biden doesn’t have a choice. If he didn’t sign a bill with near-unanimous bipartisan support, it would immediately be called out as a personal agenda “secretly helping China” or something similar.

    • sincle354@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      6 months ago

      Tone down the conspiracy theory angle. It’s lemmy, you can get more interaction by mentioning capitalism rather than censorship.

      • lautan@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        Not this guy again. In my opinion they tell us small truths like CCP bad, etc. Which isn’t wrong but they’re concealing the true motivation. Why ban it now? Not two years ago? It’s because TikTok needs to be under better control for the upcoming election and in the future. We already know big tech all work in concert to conceal topics for the US.

    • Korkki@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      It’s the only big non-US owned social media. They hate that because it’s much harder to control. It’s not even about the profits to be had, tiktok gets more eyeballs and especially it gets the young people’s attention and has more public thrusts than all of the MSM combined and because Bytedance doesn’t hate their HQ in the US the US government, intelligence or special interests, can’t just call them and strong arm them into censoring whatever talking point that they don’t like currently. It’s not much more complex than that. “Chinese spying on Americans” is just projection of what all the other platforms do.

      Those who push this will not be happy no matter what Tiktok does or whatever concessions it makes. They already hold american data in American and EU data in the EU for example. Did that stop the “muh CCP influence” propaganda? Well, no… Their main goal would be to get Bytedance to sell the platform to Americans, atleast the american business. I guess they would rather let it get banned and sacrifice American or even all the western markets than to let that happen. It would be a loss to them either way.

    • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      The platform is already pretty censored, mentions of Palestine get fucked by the algo, I barely even see it from people I follow if I don’t look up their past videos.

      But I could imagine that’s the impetus for congress, Trump tried the same thing after Tiktok was used to organize ~a million people RSVPing free tickets to a trump rally, resulting in him doing his shtick infront of like 100 people in a stadium. He only stopped after a major donor asked him not to, and it was very unpopular. Now dems are in Trumps position after hearing the kids are using Tiktok to organize against them, of course they’d make the same calculation and try to ban it.