mesamunefire@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoGoogle pulls the plug on uBlock Origin, leaving over 30 million Chrome users susceptible to intrusive adswww.windowscentral.comexternal-linkmessage-square234linkfedilinkarrow-up11.05Karrow-down117
arrow-up11.03Karrow-down1external-linkGoogle pulls the plug on uBlock Origin, leaving over 30 million Chrome users susceptible to intrusive adswww.windowscentral.commesamunefire@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square234linkfedilink
minus-squareMike@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down15·1 year agoYou pasted the domain not an actual blog post link. And you’re the one making these claims about him on a forum, does it really surprise you when someone asks for the source? Sorry you had to google something.
minus-squareTheGrandNagus@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10arrow-down2·edit-21 year agoI gave a link to the source, his blog, and gave instructions on how to find each statement. I even gave timestamps. I gave you the source as soon as you asked. The source is Stallman’s blog, stallman.org. Apology accepted, don’t worry about it. You just came across as a bit of a sealion, that’s all. Anyway, the point is, yes, Stallman has been a repeated defender of paedophilia and having sex with family pets. Personally for me that’s a mark against him. But that’s just my opinion, a lot of people in the Linux don’t really mind.
minus-squareoortjunk@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·1 year agoYou were the one looking for proof? Then you do the googling. That is how this shit works, genius.
minus-squareAstralPath@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·1 year agoYou’ve got the burden of proof backwards, pal.
minus-squareWldFyre@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoOnline discussions aren’t formal debates, bud.
minus-squareoortjunk@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoLucky this isn’t a court of law, buddy.
You pasted the domain not an actual blog post link. And you’re the one making these claims about him on a forum, does it really surprise you when someone asks for the source? Sorry you had to google something.
I gave a link to the source, his blog, and gave instructions on how to find each statement. I even gave timestamps.
I gave you the source as soon as you asked. The source is Stallman’s blog, stallman.org.
Apology accepted, don’t worry about it. You just came across as a bit of a sealion, that’s all.
Anyway, the point is, yes, Stallman has been a repeated defender of paedophilia and having sex with family pets.
Personally for me that’s a mark against him. But that’s just my opinion, a lot of people in the Linux don’t really mind.
Sod off, sealion
You were the one looking for proof? Then you do the googling.
That is how this shit works, genius.
You’ve got the burden of proof backwards, pal.
Online discussions aren’t formal debates, bud.
Lucky this isn’t a court of law, buddy.