Depends a lot on the proofreading the scientists did before “deploying” it:

Radical Numerics’ research is really more like a blog post — not only was the study self-published, rather than being vetted by a scientific journal, but it hasn’t even been peer reviewed. Making matters even murkier, the company declined to share clinical information about the patient or the doctors involved with the NYT, citing the proprietary nature of a treatment it hopes to monetize.

Say no more. Is Elizabeth Holmes out of prison now?

OK, no I don’t have that. Did not know that was required to get a .eu.org subdomain.

Client or server?

Not my use case, but it’s amazing that this exists. No registration necessary.

Nice. Just registered an account and tried to register a subdomain.eu.org to my VPS’ IPv4 address, but I keep getting

SOA from SUBDOMAIN.EU.ORG at nnn.nn.nn.nn: Error: Timeout

Maybe I just have to wait but I’m not sure I’m doing this right at all…

I always read this as shardware.

I do mind not being accessible to the average person.

Not sure how to explain how imagination works.

Unless you meant something else?

Are you saying website owners are always located in the country their .tld belongs to?

I’m looking for solutions here, so I did go to the actual site and checked before I wrote the above.

Interesting free tier option:

Feeling broke?

Instead of paying, you can leave us a friendly message or tell us how you use PageKite, and get free service in return.

And they’re from Iceland. And GDPR-compliant. And FOSS.

❤️❤️❤️

I think we have a winner. Let’s see how they respond to my explanations.

tl;dr: agentic AI.

If you don’t know what that is, read the article. IMO it is right, clickbait title phrasing excused.

Well done! I hope you wrote a tutorial on the process?

Thanks. Based in NL is certainly a plus.

Thanks, this looks good.

will ask for cc details.

So far I never had any problems making stuff up there.

That’s good to hear 👍

I’ll add to that:

Does me lending a book from the library not count?

The article is too much about direct remuneration. It reeks of a failed business-person’s bitterness.

It’s not all about the money, and every artist should know that.

The article is just ragebait. And it’s 10 months old. It speaks poorly of OP that they felt the need to share it. There are much better ways of starting this discussion.

Thankfully there is an archived version and it’s every bit as pretentious and dumb as its thumbnail and its title suggest. And then they have the nerve to sign as if they were speaking for Artists writ large.

Well good. The sentence I quoted from only talks about accusations though. And the blurb seems to contradict itself in the very next sentence, citring several more “rare” examples.

I have nothing against ArsTechnica (yet) so I guess it’s just bad phrasing.

Thanks for sharing.

Google is directly liable for the content of its AI-generated search summaries.

(…)

The judges classified AI Overviews not as mere search results but as Google’s own statements, meaning the company itself has to answer for them.

GOOD. The world is not Big Tech’s sandbox.

No way this goes through in the EU. Frankly this should be against the law in any country. It’s one thing to say “Whatever you do on our platform belongs to us”, but it’s a whole other thing to do this.

And then they’re going to whine about the EU waging war against the US again.

Please let me out of this universe, I’ll try a parallel one.