Neural nets are pattern recognition and repetition machines - nothing more or less.

If black people have historically been given harsher punishments by the criminal justice system (duh), any neural net is going to pattern match and print out a heavier sentence for a black person based on its training data.

I would be amazed if it didn’t.

Nice cop-out!

If it makes you feel better I feel the same way about you, given you appear to be in love with ad hominem.

3/3 of your comments were intellectually lazy, 2/3 were ad hominem. Do you ever contribute anything meaningful or am I good to block you?

Edit:

Wait, why wait for your answer? Someone doing an ad hominem multiple times in a row is obviously not worth chatting with further. Seeya!

I’m just glad the Lemmy devs didn’t set a maximum block limit so I don’t have to pick and choose which bad-faith attackers like yourself I block.

One person’s opinion is another person’s “objectively stupid.”

I have yet to see a reasonable proposition on how to do traffic enforcement that seems to sit right with the vast majority of people.

My point in making the above joke(s) is that this is the alternative that many people cried out for. It feels like goal-post moving when every way to enforce the law is “but not this way, a different way.”

My guess at the common denominator that cannot possibly be objectively confirmed is that people simply don’t want to be met with consequences for breaking the law, and no matter how that’s done it will be rejected.

In other words, every way to enforce traffic has downsides - every single one. This is the one that does not involve cops. As you see, this is the downside. It’s laughably easy to “THIS IS BAD” at it while proposing no alternatives, and very amusing when an alternative (like this one) is eventually picked apart for being “objectively stupid” when its downsides inevitably crop up.

“Law enforcement should be conducted specifically in the way that I imagine, not in the way that people vote for.”

- Someone speaking unironically, believe it or not.

“Take cops out of the equation for traffic enforcement.”

“NO, not like that!!!”

Right, I covered that in my last paragraph.

Calls for violence are against their ToS. Shocker!

Not to mention physical courage.

Aren’t you supposed to wait for something to be widely adopted before you enshittify it?

I get long-term enshittification in pursuit of short term Line Must Go Up but I feel like this would significantly impede it even in the short term.

Kinda reeks of Meta being in financial trouble.

Musk definitely has zero understanding of Kessler Syndrome; one of many drops in a bucket of evidence that he’s not the genius his PR team wants us to think he is.

They solve a couple issues but introduce a host of others.

If you focus on the couple issues solved, you’re obviously biased.

Yeah, mainstream folks like mainstream social media.

they ban you even if go too hard on trump

Uhh… no. I shit on him routinely on Reddit and I have yet to be banned.

Do you mean actively call for violence against him? Then yeah, they’ll ban you for that.

Another reminder that the average IQ is 100.

Yep, they’ll hit you with the:

🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓

Not all authoritarians or assholes are tankies.

The mod guiltiest for the abuses of /r/tampa is probably a card-carrying Liberal, given he’s a(n alleged) former Marine that allows racist dogwhistles to be posted in /r/tampa but also invites people to /r/liberalgunowners. He goes by /u/md28usmc.

I did an AskLemmy post about it a few months ago: https://lemmy.world/post/43898917?scrollToComments=true

As you can see, there’s not even consensus on whether or not VPNs are in fact being treated differently, let alone why. There are some in that thread that insist it’s a great idea, too.

There’s a way to View Moderation History on yourself and others on Lemmy. Sometimes the people that ban you leave an explanation. Sometimes they think it’s obvious or you’re beneath them so they don’t.

1. My city’s subreddit is very active (though the moderators recently went mad with power). I’m actively stealing their content to grow the Lemmy community for it.

2. People talk about legal stuff a lot on Reddit, including asking (ex-)cops questions about them (because lots of (ex-)cops use Reddit).