No, that I can’t answer — it would depend entirely on the level of fallout and where it happens to land.

You would need to be able to perfectly, and I mean perfectly, predict weather months in advance in order to prepare accordingly.

The reaility is that for an AI, or rather an AGI, to make the choice to launch nukes would require them to reach a point where they accept the potential loss of their own ‘life’ in exchange for whatever value a nuclear war might hold. I struggle to believe that a ‘true’ AGI would make that choice. There are far too many variables to control in comparison to a biological agent, one that likely would not affect a machine.

Now, a modern AI making that choice? Absolutely possible, the things are fucking crazy with literally no concept of what life is.

I repeat, radiation absolutely fucks electronic components. I am not talking about an emp, I am talking about radiation.

Radiation absolutely fucks electronic components

I guess I’ll know to be impressed by AI when it can distinguish things like sarcasm.

Absolutely not, I’m still just scratching my head at how something like this is allowed to happen.

Has any human ever said that they’re worried about their car getting dirtied on the way to the carwash? Maybe I could see someone arguing against getting a carwash, citing it getting dirty on the way home — but on the way there?

Like you would think it wouldn’t have the basis to even put those words together that way — should I see this as a hallucination?

Granted, I would never ask an AI a question like this — it seems very far outside of potential use cases for it (for me).

Edit: oh, I guess it could have been said by a person in a sarcastic sense

Dirtying the car on the way there?

The car you’re planning on cleaning at the car wash?

Like, an AI not understanding the difference between walking and driving almost makes sense. This, though, seems like such a weird logical break that I feel like it shouldn’t be possible.

About as comfortable as plastic wrapped in a thin sponge can be

Raping children is what you call ‘not perfect’?

No, simply no — try that comment again only do it without defending child rapists.

Meanwhile my girlfriend and I just got done watching a 2 hour video on Japans creepiest educational video, subject of which is the Heian era of Japan. Her algorithm pulls are goated.

I think the word you’re looking for there is surreptitiously

So Clair Obscur, the game that absolutely won game of the year, lost due to a technicality.

The generative AI use everyone is pearl clutching about would be textures. As in things that have been procedurally generated (you don’t actually care what they look like, they are just there to smooth out wrinkles) for years.

As someone who hates AI, this is just fucking stupid. Like, you are a virtue signaling luddite if you believe that this usage of AI tarnishes the rest of the fucking game.

You mean the experimental reactors? Your comment implies that there are currently big data centers running fusion reactors to power them and that is just false.

No you don’t, now suck down your government mandated AI slop and say thank you — you philistine.

Why would I ever do that? Ever?

I don’t think anyone just uses one device anymore, pretty sure there are workarounds.

Hey so, this might seem pretty extreme but um…

People who even attempt to steal sunlight should die. I don’t care how, they should just be dead.

I’m surprised to see a comment on a post from so long ago but yes, it was an incredibly blatant display.

Because I do not want Microsoft to have access to all my documents.

That’s not how cloud save works! …

You need to explain why you think the second statement refutes the first.

It’s the latter, counter point; the tool never would have existed without the unethical scraping.

Then maybe they should choose their words more carefully, because that is not what their words portray