Personally, I don’t mind the “I asked AI and it said…” Because I can choose to ignore anything that follows.
Yes, I can judge the sender. But consent is still in my hands.
Otherwise, I largely agree with the article on its points, and also appreciate it raising the overall topic of etiquette given a new technology.
Like the shift to smart phones, this changes the social landscape.
The FSF explanation of why they dislike Anubis could just as easily apply to the process of decrypting TLS/HTTPS. You know, something uncontroversial that every computer is expected to do when they want to communicate securely.
I don’t fundamentally see the difference between “The computer does math to ensure end-to-end privacy” and “The computer does math to mitigate DDoS attempts on the server”. Either way, without such protections the client/server relationship is lacking crucial fundamentals that many interactions depend on.
Your response is short and quippy in a way that might be read as un-serious or dismissive, but its absolutely correct.
The users come first. The software is a tool and has no inherent “needs”.
Your average user likely agrees with the statement " my device sending my data to big tech, and being cluttered with ads isn’t nice", but they lack the time, knowledge, and interest to fix it.
Once installed, Linux (on supported hardware) is (to my best understanding and experience) no harder or easier than windows or Mac for most things.
I understand my tech expertise might give be blinders on the accuracy of that statement, but I have witnessed enough similar sentiment to begin believing it.
The challenge is getting over the installation hurdle, and putting users in the same mindset Mac users already instinctively have: “the instructions you find online might not apply to you because you are not in the majority”.
Preinstalled by OEM is it. The final and ultimate hurdle to gain a loooot of traction.