Mastodon: @misk@pol.social

Piefed: @misk@piefed.social

Opinions exclusively of my own and of voices in my head.

Autism, communism, arthitism, cannabism.

  • 438 Posts
  • 434 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: September 2nd, 2023

help-circle










  • misk@sopuli.xyzBanned from communitytoGaming@beehaw.orghave positive reviews destroyed games?
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    Honestly I haven’t seen the video but it looks like something I was wondering about recently so let me explain.

    We’re more and more confused as to how mainstream games look like, as if gameplay was not a consideration at all. One could argue that this is due to lack of direction and trying to satisfy as many market needs as possible.

    At the same time I also think that there could be an issue where there is no constructive feedback in the discussion because all of the reviews were either paid for (with a game copy and maybe some other goodies too) or have an interest in creating an outrage (culture wars or being negative all the time). There’s no middle ground so everyone works in the dark. Honest reviewers are rare and you need to find someone matching your taste which is beyond most people so it’s kind of irrelevant for how things look in general.


  • misk@sopuli.xyzBanned from communitytoGaming@beehaw.orgLet's discuss: Grand Theft Auto
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    According to pcgamingwiki it has frame pacing and stutter issues even on high end systems. I’m okay with how it runs on current PCs and Xbox Series X but that’s because I can stomach 40 fps with inconsistent frame pacing - many people can’t and at this point it’s probably best to hope for some updated version.


  • misk@sopuli.xyzBanned from communitytoGaming@beehaw.orgLet's discuss: Grand Theft Auto
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 months ago

    I didn’t think that gimmicky game where you run over lines of people (monks? cadets?) would become that popular. Never figured what they were exactly but it was fun. Quest system was a dealbreaker for me. I didn’t know English that well and timed missions suck.

    • I skipped 2 based on experience with the first. I think I missed more colourful lighting but not much more than that.
    • Couldn’t ignore 3 which was technically impressive but was kind of boring otherwise. Played it to kill time but Tony Hawk was still better at that.
    • 4 ran like shit but the story kept me playing. This thing needs a proper remaster to evaluate.
    • 5 was an all around achievement and a landmark in a video game history. It’s probably the closest thing to a modern Blizzard game - not exactly innovative but really polished and treated reasonably well for years.

    Never touched a game with predatory monetisation so I never touched multiplayer. Heard it sucks but somehow it’s making a bank.