2·
1 year agoThe browser would need to be allowed to parse it, as they’re the ones displaying the content; it would imply, however, that adblockers and other extensions would no longer be allowed.
Oro [she/they]
Queer individual from southeast Texas. Helping to work on the Linux desktop - currently contributing to Flatpak and Flathub, getting familiar with GNOME.
Can find me at:
https://orowith2os.gitlab.io/ https://tech.lgbt/@orowith2os https://github.com/orowith2os/ https://gitlab.com/OroWith2Os/
- 0 Posts
- 4 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
Cake day: July 8th, 2023
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
you’re running a drm-compilant browser
They also don’t want users to be able to use adblockers, that isn’t all they’re checking for. So this absolutely is the case. Their entire proposal is contradictory.
The point of this is so that the user can’t modify the site at all, despite what the proposal might say. Their goals and non-goals are contradictory.
Running this content in a container will not protect you. Just don’t even try to adapt to it. Reject it completely.
Possibly, but it sounds like a pain to work with, if I understand the technical details correctly.