cross-posted from: https://thelemmy.club/post/57178743

RyanL Bitwarden Employee

Hello everyone!

Starting in the next release, the Bitwarden apps published to the various stores will be the commercially licensed builds. No action is needed, and the apps will work exactly as they do today.

Bitwarden remains committed to open source security and transparency
The GPLv3 OSS licensed version continues to be updated and published on GitHub
All current features are available in both versions
License details are on GitHub
Bitwarden remains committed to a robust, free forever plan for everyone

If you have any questions, please ask them in this thread. Thanks all!

EDIT:

Bitwarden is not going closed-source
You can still fork Bitwarden
No change to self-hosting, the licensing change affects those who are repackaging and reselling Bitwarden
The free plan is here to stay permanently
  • Grand@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Pretty much seen it coming when the new CEO came in and removed the words “Transparency” and “Always Free” from the official marketing.

  • NGC2346@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    7 hours ago

    If you are on Lemmy, theres very high probability that you also have the technical abilities required to self host Vaultwarden and stop relying on a greedy company for your most critical aspect.

    • Nullpwn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 minutes ago

      Yes because using a different then normies app also means technical skills. In fact, haven’t your PhD diploma came along when you signed up for your Lemmy account?

    • ImpulseDrive42@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      I have Vaultwarden, it works with the web app and browser extensions. But is there a vaultwarden specific android app? I know technically I can use the Bitwarden app. But sometimes they update the Bitwarden app too fast for all the changes to translate into Vaultwarden and then im kinda forced to use the web app.

      The web app is just a minor inconvenience to me so I continue to use it. Just wondering if there is an easier Vaultwarden specific solution for android.

  • Jubei Kibagami@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Fantastic. I’m tired of having to change password managers. DashLane, Keepass, LastPass, etc., they all end up shooting their own foot somehow.

    • giant_smeeg@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Don’t even know where i’d switch.

      Proton -> I already use Proton suite and I like the seperation, the 2 password option doesn’t work for me either. I just need a seperate password.

      Keepass -> I use quite a few devices and the sync just seems like a nightmare…

      Any other options? For now i’ll stick as BW is still great but will start exploring others.

          • SepticModular@quokk.au
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            30 minutes ago

            But thousands of people have it working just fine. Not calling you out but it does work very well. Did you follow a step by step guide? I know websearch makes it hard to learn new tech things these days.

            Just keep in mind, set up a default folder and file (filename.kdbx) to share on one device, add Remote Device (QR code helps there), go to Sharing Tab and select Default Folder. If the Default Folder isn’t ticked on both devices in the Sharing Tab on each, nothing happens. When you work it out, that folder can be called anything and you can get advanced with how or when it shares or which direction the data goes (think photo backup from mobile to desktop).

            New Android app to use is:

            https://github.com/chenxiaolong/BasicSync

            Use Obtainium- https://github.com/ImranR98/Obtainium - to install it and keep it updated. Obtainium can update itself the same way.

            Convoluted, I know, but so is relying on a company to host for you in the cloud. They just hide all the complexity behind the interface. With Syncthing, once it’s set up between all your devices (and there is a way to quickly auto accept setup once further advanced/knowledgeable), it just chugs along in the background. Changes to keepass file appear almost instantly across each device once it’s opened.

  • Rose@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    13 hours ago

    When Bitwarden got a meh “refresh” of the user interface and started vibe coding stuff (I’m not some super hard-line anti-AI person, but dammit, you absolutely should not vibe code security-critical apps), I switched to KeePassX. It was like coming back home! I used to use KeePass and KeePass 2, switched to Bitwarden for a long while, and while it was neat, KeePassX is just neater. (Doesn’t have cloud sync, but syncing the vault files with LocalSend is easy enough.)

  • doctorflynt@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Because i havent seen it on this thread theres also passbolt

    i havent used it personaly (yet) because its offline mode is still in beta.

  • ture@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 hours ago

    That’s quite the disappointment. Probably need to prepare to switch away from bitwarden or at least research options for open source clients for my vaultwarden backend.

    • superglue@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Someone can correct me, but this change seems to be targeting people who are repackaging bitwarden and selling it. It does feel like we are trending the wrong direction though.

      • ture@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        42
        ·
        14 hours ago

        If you read their announcement carefully you’ll find things like

        All current features are available in both versions
        

        Which strongly implies that the different versions will start to diverge over time. Then at one point they will just be like maah it’s not worth putting more work into the open source thing, we’ll focus on building new cool features yada yada yada. And this is how all the open to partly open to closed source rug pulls worked in the last years.

        (If you want to do this the worst way possible like MinIO you also squash / delete the Git history the moment you announce you’re only working on closed source)

      • ture@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Before Bitwarden / Vaultwarden I went with Keepass (it was some fork don’t remember the exact name KeepassXC probably) synced via Nextcloud. It’s not as convenient as Bitwarden plus at least back then it didn’t support passkeys. So yeah, I don’t know what is actually out there. Honestly I don’t think it’s super urgent to start hunting for alternatives but probably we should have at least some ideas in case the Bitwarden team does some weird moves.

  • AppleMango@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 hour ago

    I think all of us can just move to using Vaultwarden, it seems to fix problems even in the old free version of Bitwarden.

      • AppleMango@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        So these changes affect the client app too? If that’s the case can’t the client app be replaced?

        At that point the only thing that would remain is the protocol itself

  • dmtalon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Sigh… I hope this isn’t the first move of enshitifying bitwarden. I read the comments/replies and hope this is benign but I’m now nervous

    • scytale@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      47
      ·
      14 hours ago

      The first move was when they hired a CEO who comes from private equity. This is the second move.

    • Mike Wooskey@lemmy.thewooskeys.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      I think it is the next move (not the first) in enshittifying bitwarden. I think the first move was the leadership change announced in May.

  • woelkchen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 hours ago

    App store EULAs and GPLv3 frequently clash. This change only affects the app store binary releases.

      • woelkchen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        So, 99% of users.

        How? It’s not like the source code if no longer under GPL, it’s just that this specific compiled binary is under a different license but it doesn’t change anything for anyone in real life.

  • E_coli42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    15 hours ago

    I have a proton membership anyways so proton pass seems good since they have SimpleLogin

    • PalmTreeIsBestTree@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Same, probably going to switch to it eventually even though I don’t like having all my eggs in one basket. Proton provides me a good quality service, can’t lie.