• Blisterexe@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 days ago

    I can comprehend it, but calling it understandable and different in the way that you did frames it as somehow less bad. The individual person is not “their oppressors”. That’s the part I disagree with.

    I think you’d balk at someone saying that someone being racist was “understandable” because there was a black gang active where they grew up.

    • velma@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      I think misandry is less bad than misogyny, as in it does less harm because of the way our systems are set up in a patriarchal society, but that doesn’t mean my belief is that misandry is good.

      I think you’d balk at someone saying that someone being racist was “understandable” because there was a black gang active where they grew up.

      Understandable is not the same as excusable.

      • Blisterexe@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        That makes sense, I think things like misandry are as harmful as things like misogyny on a case-by-case basis when removed from context, but of course misogyny is far more harmful overall, unless I’m stupid that seems to be what you’re also saying.

        For the understandable thing I was working with this definition:

        Expected or accepted under the circumstances.

        Which I would disagree with, but I think you were working off of this one:

        Capable of being understood; intelligible.

        Which, if you were, I agree with you.

        • velma@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 days ago

          That makes sense, I think things like misandry are as harmful as things like misogyny on a case-by-case basis when removed from context, but of course misogyny is far more harmful overall, unless I’m stupid that seems to be what you’re also saying.

          That’s exactly what I’m saying.

          Capable of being understood; intelligible.

          Which, if you were, I agree with you.

          Yep we’re on the same page now.

            • velma@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 days ago

              Thanks for taking the time to understand my comments and for being open to other points of view.

              We both dislike TERFs, we’re on the same side :)