• eicker@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    3 days ago

    Uber spent a decade telling cities that protecting taxi drivers was anti innovation. Now that robotaxis threaten its own business, suddenly limits on new competitors sound reasonable. Amazing how quickly »disruption« becomes »regulation« when the disruption reaches the boardroom.

    • Maya S. Trojan@piefed.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 days ago

      So much regulation can sadly be boiled down to the idea “Contempt of Business Model.” Because once that business is entrenched and can afford lobbyists, now it’s time to lobby anything other than their business model as illegal.

    • tal@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 days ago

      Uber spent a decade telling cities that protecting taxi drivers was anti innovation. Now that robotaxis threaten its own business, suddenly limits on new competitors sound reasonable.

      Uber has also been working on and I’m pretty sure has been operating robotaxis.

      My impression is that human drivers were probably going to be a temporary situation for them as they built out their system, which would provide a strategically-advantageous position relative to competing robotaxi operators for them to do the transition to robotaxis.

      searches

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uber

      The company has launched or is in the process of launching robotaxi services in several cities worldwide in partnership with operators, software designers, and car manufacturers including Lucid Motors, Nuro, Baidu, Pony.ai, Avride, Nissan, Rivian, Zoox, Stellantis, Wayve, and Nvidia (to use the Nvidia Drive software).[3][4][5][6]