• aim4harmony@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        13 hours ago

        In the context of current events, it seems a practical and smart crisis planning step. Especially useful for hospitals and institutions to secure a necessary data flow.

        • eicker@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          13 hours ago

          It seems to me far wiser to spread services more widely across several providers. Seriously: how daft is it to buy email, instant messaging, video conferencing from a single provider?

          • sylver_dragon@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            9 hours ago

            Microsoft builds its ecosystem around vendor lock-in. You’re using Entra? M365 integrates real nicely with that. Oh, you want to use something else? Well, good luck with that, our documentation is so piss poor even CoPilot won’t be able to help you. And once you drink the M365 kool-aid, now you have Exchange, Outlook, Teams and Office. You also get afflicted with SharePoint as a bonus! Good luck justifying anything else to your management.

            Honestly, I don’t see how MS hasn’t fall afoul of EU anti-trust laws, again. They have bound everything up so tightly that you’re lucky installing Windows doesn’t obligate you to a lifetime of M365 subscription costs.

            • adarza@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              4 hours ago

              you’re lucky installing Windows doesn’t obligate you to a lifetime of M365 subscription costs.

              “hey, no peeking at our business plan!” --microsoft (probablymost definitely)

          • 🇨🇦GreenBeard🇨🇦@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            12 hours ago

            Interoperability becomes an issue though. FLOSS and federated systems help there, but we all know the big providers aren’t going to play ball. Unless we rebuild the whole stack from the ground up, proprietary systems are always going to try to funnel everyone into vendor lock-in and platform monopolies. This is the end result of choices that were made 30 years ago, based on assumptions that didn’t hold up, but none of us now dealing with the consequences, had any say in making.

            • robert@piefed.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              5 hours ago

              This is the end result of choices that were made 30 years ago, based on assumptions that didn’t hold up

              What assumptions are you referring to?

              • 🇨🇦GreenBeard🇨🇦@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                5 hours ago

                That proprietary walled gardens were inherently more stable and user friendly. That private companies would, by their nature, incest whatever it took to maximize the quality of their products to maintain competitive advantage. That corporate consolidation could never become a vulnerability in its own right.