• nil@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    Every company in Japan that adopt MS shit surely have fax with them, can confirm.

  • eicker@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    80
    arrow-down
    22
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Japan keeping fax machines around suddenly looks less like resistance to progress and more like disaster recovery planning. Microsoft spent years selling the future of work, only for a paper tray and a dial tone to become the high availability tier.

        • frongt@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 hours ago

          They intentionally keep the AI-generated content short, for that reason.

          Also, it’s pretty easy to avoid the AI tone depending on the model you use, by training it on desired text samples, or by just asking it to use a certain tone. It’s pretty obvious that they’ve prompted it for something like “two sentences and a snide joke”, because that’s the form of every one of their initial comments.

    • hneerqe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      I’ll guess any business grade copy machine can also do fax without much setup. Old protocols don’t just vanish. It was only microslop that went down, that shit is just not needed that badly.

      • thanksforallthefish@literature.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        While true, outside Japan I doubt anyone still has an analogue line connected to their copier, hell the UK are turning our POTS off this year I yhink. And yes fax gateways over ethernet were a thing but you still need to set one up - and finding someone who knows how to, and get the software, and find a provider to do the breakout back to POTS.

      • aim4harmony@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        15 hours ago

        In the context of current events, it seems a practical and smart crisis planning step. Especially useful for hospitals and institutions to secure a necessary data flow.

        • eicker@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          15 hours ago

          It seems to me far wiser to spread services more widely across several providers. Seriously: how daft is it to buy email, instant messaging, video conferencing from a single provider?

          • sylver_dragon@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            11 hours ago

            Microsoft builds its ecosystem around vendor lock-in. You’re using Entra? M365 integrates real nicely with that. Oh, you want to use something else? Well, good luck with that, our documentation is so piss poor even CoPilot won’t be able to help you. And once you drink the M365 kool-aid, now you have Exchange, Outlook, Teams and Office. You also get afflicted with SharePoint as a bonus! Good luck justifying anything else to your management.

            Honestly, I don’t see how MS hasn’t fall afoul of EU anti-trust laws, again. They have bound everything up so tightly that you’re lucky installing Windows doesn’t obligate you to a lifetime of M365 subscription costs.

            • adarza@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              7 hours ago

              you’re lucky installing Windows doesn’t obligate you to a lifetime of M365 subscription costs.

              “hey, no peeking at our business plan!” --microsoft (probablymost definitely)

          • 🇨🇦GreenBeard🇨🇦@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            15 hours ago

            Interoperability becomes an issue though. FLOSS and federated systems help there, but we all know the big providers aren’t going to play ball. Unless we rebuild the whole stack from the ground up, proprietary systems are always going to try to funnel everyone into vendor lock-in and platform monopolies. This is the end result of choices that were made 30 years ago, based on assumptions that didn’t hold up, but none of us now dealing with the consequences, had any say in making.

            • robert@piefed.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              8 hours ago

              This is the end result of choices that were made 30 years ago, based on assumptions that didn’t hold up

              What assumptions are you referring to?

              • 🇨🇦GreenBeard🇨🇦@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                7 hours ago

                That proprietary walled gardens were inherently more stable and user friendly. That private companies would, by their nature, incest whatever it took to maximize the quality of their products to maintain competitive advantage. That corporate consolidation could never become a vulnerability in its own right.

  • scops@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    13 hours ago

    This isn’t adding up to me. Unless you’re paying out the ass for an analog line, you need more that just a fax machine and a jack. You either have a VoIP system with fax support, or you’ve moved to a FoIP service that probably handles everything through email anyway (or both).

    Unless you already do a ton of business through your phone system and can justify a robust solution, there’s no way you’re ready to just turn up some old All-In-Ones and you’re just better off eating the cost of this outage and going after Microsoft for whatever your SLA gets you.

    “Analog” is expensive as hell today and there’s no way it’s a justifiable expense outside of extremely remote areas.

    • tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 hours ago

      They never shut down that infrastructure. Japan was still using some 3.5" floppies in the mid-late 2000s and still manufactured VCRs until 2016. The fax tech is still very much intact.

    • adarza@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      we sent like three short faxes in fifteen years at this location, so we got rid of ours here in the office. we will go to the library or to a bank and pay them a few bucks to send one now. we’ve had to do that only once in the last six years or so. dumping the fax allows us the flexibility to also dump the POTS if the landline telcos become even greedier bastards than they currently are.

    • ZeDoTelhado@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Considering the average age of the Japanese population I wouldn’t be shocked to find out a somewhat big percentage still use last century methods. Hell, I remember somewhere mentioned the last system with floppies was finally put to rest on the government level (do not recall exactly the story but I think was in Japan)