• WagnasT@iusearchlinux.fyi
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    inal but i think it’s going to come down to the terms of service where the data was scraped from. If the terms say the stuff you post can be shared with third parties then they might not have a leg to stand on. Where it gets sketchy is if someone posted someone else’s work, then the original author had no say in it being shared with a third party, BUT, is that the fault of the third party or the service provider that shared it?

    Also, if i were exposed to copyright material through some unauthorised person distributing it can i not summarize the information? I guess i don’t know enough about fair use to answer that.

    The wording in the article says they are being sued for stealing their data, this seems like a stretch but i guess i’ll wait for more details of the case.

    • Armok: God of Blood@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      The thing is that the images are used to train a set of weights and biases; the training data isn’t distributed as part of the AI or as part of the software used to generate images.