“Select Play Partners” can block unofficial installation of their apps.

You might sideload an Android app, or manually install its APK package, if you’re using a custom version of Android that doesn’t include Google’s Play Store. Alternately, the app might be experimental, under development, or perhaps no longer maintained and offered by its developer. Until now, the existence of sideload-ready APKs on the web was something that seemed to be tolerated, if warned against, by Google.

This quiet standstill is being shaken up by a new feature in Google’s Play Integrity API. As reported by Android Authority, developer tools to push “remediation” dialogs during sideloading debuted at Google’s I/O conference in May, have begun showing up on users’ phones. Sideloaders of apps from the British shop Tesco, fandom app BeyBlade X, and ChatGPT have reported “Get this app from Play” prompts, which cannot be worked around. An Android gaming handheld user encountered a similarly worded prompt from Diablo Immortal on their device three months ago.

Google’s Play Integrity API is how apps have previously blocked access when loaded onto phones that are in some way modified from a stock OS with all Google Play integrations intact. Recently, a popular two-factor authentication app blocked access on rooted phones, including the security-minded GrapheneOS. Apps can call the Play Integrity API and get back an “integrity verdict,” relaying if the phone has a “trustworthy” software environment, has Google Play Protect enabled, and passes other software checks.

Graphene has questioned the veracity of Google’s Integrity API and SafetyNet Attestation systems, recommending instead standard Android hardware attestation. Rahman notes that apps do not have to take an all-or-nothing approach to integrity checking. Rather than block installation entirely, apps could call on the API only during sensitive actions, issuing a warning there. But not having a Play Store connection can also deprive developers of metrics, allow for installation on incompatible devices (and resulting bad reviews), and, of course, open the door to paid app piracy.

  • Riley@lemmy.mlEnglish
    2·
    4 months ago

    If the Play Store becomes required like that then Android’s already-shaky status as an open source base platform is going to go out the window. I’m glad there are non-Google distros of Android but there really needs to be more of a push to make a completely FOSS phone platform.

    • IllNess@infosec.pubEnglish
      0·
      4 months ago

      There are Linux phones available. I,m going to guess popularity of those devices to increase soon.

      • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish
        1·
        4 months ago

        That was the hope with Android, too.

        The problem is that as the OS is “free” that means it costs less functionally for the device manufacturer to get an OS on the device, so now they can pour more money into bloatware.

        Android was supposed to stop bloatware but all it did was enable it.

        Even without a forced “store” Linux is prey to the same issue of piecemeal support from various vendors all with in-house solutions that all stink.

      • Vik@lemmy.worldEnglish
        0·
        4 months ago

        As much as I want that to be the case, I don’t think full mobile gnu+Linux is really ready to use daily?

        I haven’t exactly been keeping up with things, mind you

        • klymilark@scribe.disroot.orgEnglish
          2·
          2 months ago

          I used it as my daily phone for months, and… well, I’m willing to deal with the problems. Without pretty careful battery management it’s not feasible, and it’s hard to manage your battery given the glitches. I often found my phone dead after a couple hours because it woke the screen immediately after I locked it because… reasons, and then kept it awake until the battery died. The biggest issue aside stuff like that (small issues that cause big problems), the biggest issue was I couldn’t get a map app working. There are some distros with working maps, none for my phone. Also call quality was horrendous. Like. I’m known for being able to tolerate bad quality, but this was, at times, about as bad as I remember my firefly phone being when I was 12, and I could not feasibly understand people at times with that thing.

          But the only reason I stopped using it was because the wifi isn’t working on it. Once I get that back up and running I’ll likely switch back to it. As bad as it can be at times, I still feel more comfortable having that as my primary phone than my Android.

      • namingthingsiseasy@programming.devEnglish
        0·
        4 months ago

        But part of the appeal of Linux is the fact that you can repurpose existing computers running other OSes to run Linux instead. This is a great way to lower the barrier to entry for Linux, because it’s easy to test it on a Live USB or a dual boot. It’s much harder to do this on phones because they have locked bootloaders.

        Another problem is that phones are not productivity devices - they’re consumption devices. Maybe this is just my personal bias, but I don’t think people will be as passionate about liberating their phones because they’re inherently less useful than computers. Convenient, yes, but useful? Not as much.

        That said, I would love to be proven wrong. I would definitely consider a Linux phone if they become more popular/useful, but I can’t really justify spending hundreds of euros/dollars on something for which I don’t see any particular use.

  • FireWire400@lemmy.worldEnglish
    1·
    3 months ago

    They’re still pissed that people won’t put up with their shitty YouTube app and use Revanced instead, eh?

  • bad_alloc@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
    1·
    4 months ago

    Just the term “side loading” instantly frames installing software on a device you own as something shady.

  • cm0002@lemmy.worldEnglish
    0·
    4 months ago

    which cannot be worked around.

    Well, at least not without root lol

    Root detecting apps to Side loading detecting apps:

    First time?

    • ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.orgEnglish
      1·
      3 months ago

      I installed FakeStore and set the app’s relevant /data/system/packages.xml properties from Aurora Store to FakeStore (installer="com.android.vending" packageSource="0" installInitiator="com.android.vending", the same as Google Play Store) and rebooted, which was enough to fool the public transport app I’m using. Is this the workaround you’re talking about, or does it require MicroG too?

  • T156@lemmy.worldEnglish
    0·
    4 months ago

    What is a “trustworthy software environment”?

    Does that mean that it will get mad and fail you for having Developer options enabled? Having F-Droid installed? Having it plugged into a computer?

    • whats_all_this_then@lemmy.worldEnglish
      0·
      4 months ago

      There’s a bank here that refuses to let you log into their app if you have developer options enabled. Their service was getting much better until that point, but I dropped them completely after that.

      I use developer options to get better screen density on my large ass screen, and to you know…develop apps 🤷‍♂️

      FUCK THESE ASSHOLES WHO THINK THEY CAN TELL ME WHAT I CAN AND CAN NOT DO WITH MY PHONE

      • doctortran@lemm.eeEnglish
        1·
        3 months ago

        People seriously need to start pushing back on the word “secure” being used as a blanket excuse for every restriction.

        It feels like every time that word is used, no one is willing to call out the fact that user freedom is equally as important and it’s a lazy, disrespectful developer who won’t take that into account by finding ways to maintain both.

  • chiisana@lemmy.chiisana.netEnglish
    0·
    4 months ago

    App developers need ways to know the app has not been modified in unsanctioned manner, glad to see Android finally catching up on security with integrity checks.

  • eleitl@lemm.eeEnglish
    0·
    4 months ago

    I get most of my stuff via F-Droid or I could use Obtainium. My tablet is Google-free. This sounds like my phone should be Google-free as well.

    • loutr@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
      1·
      3 months ago

      Yeah but banking apps are starting to check integritynet, and (in France, at least) they’re pretty much mandatory to do anything useful with your bank account/credit card online… I think Uber does too, I boycott them but others might follow suit…

      Currently running lineageos, but I think I’ll just give up and go for a Pixel for my next phone… Sucks to let google win but I like to do useful things with my phone…

      • vinyl@lemmy.worldEnglish
        1·
        3 months ago

        for me for example i just use the web version of navy federal, works pretty fine.

        • UnsavoryMollusk@lemmy.worldEnglish
          1·
          3 months ago

          You can’t in some countries. Like if you want to wire something, or setup a payment you have to use the app. It’s mandatory. If you go through the website it ask to open the app to confirm it’s you.

          • dan@upvote.auEnglish
            01·
            3 months ago

            So people that only have a computer and not a smart phone can’t do those things at all?

          • vinyl@lemmy.worldEnglish
            01·
            3 months ago

            i feel like if you switch to the desktop version of the website, it wont pester you.

            • loutr@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
              1·
              3 months ago

              Unfortunately it will, if I want to add a new transfer recipient or make a payment on a 3D secure website, the app is mandatory, even on desktop.