• Almacca@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    73
    ·
    1 day ago

    Stop just fining these fuckers! They can afford any amount you fine them with. Shut down the service and charge them with crimes or gtfo.

    • theneverfox@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      50
      ·
      1 day ago

      Normally I’d agree, but if one of the more populated states fined meta at this rate it’d be a corporate death penalty

      For context - New Mexico has a population of 2,124,222, making it the 36th most populated state in the country.

      That’s under 1% of the country. California has 39,355,309… No company currently in existence could survive a 4 trillion dollar fine

      This is huge… if it goes through

      • Almacca@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        18 hours ago

        If 43 million violations of the law aren’t enough to shut something down, what is?

        • theneverfox@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 minutes ago

          Fuck if I know. We can revoke a corporate charter through an act of Congress for any or no reason, we have trust busting laws that allow courts to split a company, individual states can decide to restrict or kick out a company…

          We have mechanisms to do these things, but we don’t really have a system of corporate criminal punishment. It’s one of those problems of using an early version of democracy… Courts can fine and impose sanctions, they can prosecute individuals for their part, but as time went on instead of legislating a system of corporate punishment it’s just been left to case law

          Which doesn’t work out well, because corporations have grown to the point they can dump more way money into legal defense than the courts can put into prosecution

          So the answer to your question is basically that it doesn’t matter how much they violate the law, they’re to big and too powerful for the courts to handle them with the tools available

      • Noxy@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        15 hours ago

        it’d be a corporate death penalty

        Good. Facebook should be shut down and liquidated.

        Rip the fucking bandaid off.

      • halcyoncmdr@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        1 day ago

        This is huge… if it goes through

        Not really. This is a lawsuit about the whole Cambridge Analytica scandal back in 2016. While the penalties could technically be up to $200 Billion… they won’t actually be anywhere near that high.

        Back in August, they settled another multi-state lawsuit for the same stuff… for $18 Billion. And that was for settling with 48 states. New Mexico and Florida were the only two states not included in that lawsuit. There’s no way in hell the punishment will be anywhere near $200 Billion for the same actions in a single state.

        The only other state that could continue going after them for these actions is Florida since the other 48 states all settled.

        So this issue is effectively over, and it fizzled out with a slap on the wrist as everyone expected because we don’t actually punish large companies in this country.

      • reksas@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        fuck around and find out. it might make other corporations think twice before breaking law

  • Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    Facebook denied the claims, arguing the company has adapted its policies since the state’s lawsuit was filed in 2021 and that it removes 99% of content that violates standards. In a deposition played for jurors, CEO Mark Zuckerberg said the company had robust systems to determine whether content should be taken down.

    Yes, standard violating content like ads for a play with content from Virginia Woolf. Feminism is for sure “standards violating content” in a fascist state.

    • ObtuseDoorFrame@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      People always upvote some form of this comment on every post that contains potential good news. Sometimes y’all need to keep your pessimism to your fucking self. It’s exhausting.

      • ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Sadly this is not pessimism but just realism. You are free to block me if that’s too uncomfortable or annoying

        • ObtuseDoorFrame@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          No, commenting “it won’t happen” on every single fucking post is pessimism. Sometimes good things happen.

          • ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 day ago

            commenting “it won’t happen” on every single fucking post

            But I don’t do that, I can’t be blamed for actions of others

            • ObtuseDoorFrame@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              1 day ago

              If it’s not you it’s someone else, and it’s still pessimism. And people still upvote it, because everything is bad, and all good news is actually bad news.

              • some_designer_dude@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                1 day ago

                If you want to stick your head in the sand and hum happy tunes to yourself, give’r. We’ll be up here living in reality where, in fact, most news is bad news for the poor in America. Sorry?

                • ObtuseDoorFrame@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 day ago

                  You’re misrepresenting reality. This article is good news, period. A jury decided Meta was at fault, and this is good regardless of your negative framing or how much they end up having to pay.

  • mannycalavera@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 day ago

    Today: Zuckerberg whispers in Trump’s ear. Tomorrow: Trump announces trade tariffs on Mexico and Venezuela.

    • bedwyr@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Funny you mention that, oil companies at least typically pay the first payment or two on fines then stop paying and the feds let it slide. Or in shitholy states like ND they get the state courts to lower the fines to nothing after attention has died down.

  • melsaskca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    That’s why all these tech guys are licking trump’s cankle holders. Like calls to like.