• davidgro@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      19 hours ago

      That app is much older than a week. I’m seeing last update 4 weeks ago and I’ve had it installed for what feels like a year or so, but might not be that long.

    • foremanguy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      12 hours ago

      I’ve never figured it to work, already tested it several times nearby glasses, didn’t recognize one

      My eyes are faster than BLE scanner xD

  • Xylight‮@lemdro.id
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 day ago

    Jesus Christ man how do devs not even try to hide AI usage anymore. From the thumbnail alone of this article, I zoom in, and I can immediately tell it’s Gemini that made this UI. Literally the cut-and-paste style it uses. It’s getting ridiculous

  • anon_8675309@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    a free Apple iOS app called Zuckoff

    I’m sure some of you will take issue but this is NOT a free app. There are in app purchases for more features. Free means it’s all free.

    • poopkins@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      22 hours ago

      But think of the developer! They used a week worth of tokens and an entire evening to have AI build it!

  • PetteriPano@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    1 day ago

    Yes, but who wants to be staring at their phone all the time.

    Maybe they could make a smart glass-app to warn about smart glasses.

        • SeductiveTortoise@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          17 hours ago

          A lot of us have, because we use them to communicate synchronously. I get why many people don’t, but it’s not like it were only boomers.

          Besides that, I get money for being reachable, and use that to buy food and stuff.

          • ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            17 hours ago

            we use them to communicate synchronously

            So do I, but having a phone != available for communication all the time.

            Besides that, I get money for being reachable, and use that to buy food and stuff.

            Well, yeah that’s what my work phone is for but I wouldn’t ever install private stuff on that, and also my above point. And it gets turned off when I sign out.

            • SeductiveTortoise@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              14 hours ago

              Same for me, but besides work, I communicate with friends and I am there for them if they need me. My phone is muted at night and work is only when working or when I’m on call.

              Last week the garage and my complex burnt down and me and the neighbors are helping the people without homes and cars. I’m available for them.

    • tal@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      Not enough coverage. I need a smart hat with lenses facing in all directions looking for anyone who might be wearing lenses that can warn me if one shows up.

  • Pxtl@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    This article seemed to be partially a pitch for camera-less smart-glasses… which I’m okay with. Camera-less smart glasses would be nice to have. Just give me wearOS for my face.

    • ISOmorph@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      As long as they’re also mic less. You can do just as much privacy invading with an open mic.

      • FatVegan@leminal.space
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        I used to love my bose frames. I would use it to listen to music, but they obviously had a mic, and it was great for phonecalls.

        If you don’t like mics, oh boy, that’s everyone with headphones

      • Krompus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        Ehh, phones have mics, and most people have a phone in their pocket these days. If you’re walking around in public, you should know that there is likely a mic nearby, so you should act accordingly. I’m not condoning public recording, it’s just the world we live in. Look up your local laws, some places require both parties’ consent for recording (honestly unrealistic these days but can be helpful in court), and some places only require one party’s consent (meaning people are allowed to record their conversations with you without telling you).

        Remember not to incriminate yourself. It’s good to know when to be quiet.

      • Blisterexe@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Seems a lot less useful without a mic though, and it’s super easy to hide a mic without smart glasses. The camera is only problematic because it’s otherwise really hard to hide one on your person.

        • ISOmorph@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Every technology is useful if it isn’t used malevolently. Alas, they are, so personally, I avoid them. Maybe at some point smart glasses will be compatible with something like GadgetBridge and I’ll be able to revisit them and teach people to use them more ethically. Just like smart watches.

  • socsa@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    Can we just wrap up this arc and get to the part where meta lets anyone opt into a “Smart Blur” function which prevents them from being recorded on Meta Glasses, but you have to set up a Facebook account with recent pictures of yourself for it to work?

    • AceFuzzLord@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      What, you want them to give even the illusion of control in this day and age? Do you know how expensive that is?! Think of the poor company! /s

  • Danarchy@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Is there no way in which these technological marvels will not surpass us average joes?