• PancakePuncher@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I don’t know.

    I know Dev teams right now that have gone full AI slop programming and their PMs and Customers see it as insane productivity to the point that they have so much work coming in they can’t stop using AI now.

    Do they agree the codebase is in utter shambles? Yes. Do they think it’s fixable? Yes. Do they think they have the time to fix it? Nope.

    They’re all just buying time waiting for it to break. The sad part is some of them are sipping the AI koolaid so hard they say they’ll just let the AI fix it when it breaks.

    I mean literally just yesterday one of the senior devs was bragging in the cube next to me that he just did 3 months of work in 5 minutes with AI.

    Most of these AI sippers are old dudes who are one foot into retirement and instead of coding they want to yap about their golf club set all day.

    As a younger dev and a person who loves to code it makes my heart hurt listening to the AI slop bragging.

  • Manticore@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    18 hours ago

    AI only feels like it boosts productivity because it kicks the can down the road and makes it somebody else’s job to clean it up.

    You saved time generating your work email? Now I spend time translating what it’s actually supposed to say because half of it is irrelevant garbage.

    You saved time generating your event poster? Now I spend time recreating it (because you’ve anchored on that version), or painstakingly editing out all the incorrect notation.

    You saved time generating your logo? No there’s no way to ‘clean it up’, the anatomy and structure makes no physical sense. So I have to recreate it from scratch anyway.

    You saved time automating this spreadsheet? It’s not arranged in an importable format and now i have to spend time breaking down all the arbitrarily merged cells so I can even use it. My computer freezes twice under the load of processing excess garbage data.

    You only think AI saves time because it’s wasting somebody else’s.

    • jtrek@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      17 hours ago

      It’s a big multiplier on incompetence. It lets someone who’s kind of bad at their job produce a lot more bad than they could before.

    • mirshafie@europe.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      17 hours ago

      The spreadsheet one hurts. I’m currently going over a colleague’s fancy spreadsheet and have decided that only an AI can edit it in the future, because the formulas are written in a way that need to be interacted with from a script or command-line tool and nobody’s going to do that.

  • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Inside the tech industry, the company with the biggest payoff in this is NVIDIA. With another smaller payoff for AMD. That’s about it.

    It’s like a gold rush for fool’s gold. The only ones making money are the guys selling shovels.

  • chrash0@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 day ago

    record numbers of “how do i connect to localhost from my friend’s laptop” and useless dashboards your devs were too busy to make, tho

  • eicker@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    84
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    The AI revolution has achieved something truly unprecedented: billions in spending, endless executive keynotes, and no measurable payoff for most businesses. Apparently the killer app was convincing CEOs to transfer their budgets to seven tech companies: »Revenue per worker is rising for the Mag 7 but is flat for the S&P 493.«

    • WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I see this as a potentially GOOD thing. All those companies who dove in headfirst are gonna come out of it significantly weakened, while those wise enough to take a more measured approach will get the opportunity to take the leadership positions they probably deserve (at least more than those others). If nothing else, there might be more competition after all this.

    • jimmy90@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      ai has also made some people way more productive and automated some really valuable things

      the entire industry hasn’t quite been one-guyed as yet. the numbers definitely don’t match the epic valuations however

  • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 day ago

    In other news,

    SHOCKING! Economically critical demographic of CEOs FAIL reverse turing test! You’ll never guess who…

  • Eternal192@anarchist.nexus
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    They were so happy to throw hardworking people onto the street in favour of AI because they were hoping for quick easy money and unless they start to grovel in front of pedo in the WH to save them with a bailout most of them will be declaring bankruptcy soon, but that might have been the plan all along so they can be bought cheap.

  • Pechente@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    It’s also a joke how poorly most companies are adopting AI. For many companies there have been meaningful improvements in software over the last few years that have been ignored completely and suddenly these same companies want to step over a bunch of stairs at once (insert meme) and do AI-buzzword-everything.

    It doesn’t work like that

    • AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      17 hours ago

      The metal fab company i work for is still using software from the 80’s. The same with our state unemployment office lol.

  • PattyMcB@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’d argue that most tech companies aren’t actually seeing benefit matching what they’ve wasted ineffectively

    • scarabic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Yeah I don’t even know if the company I work for has actually gotten more benefit than it’s cost us. The bill is significant, for one thing. For another we have a whole group of people developing AI tools for internal use now. They aren’t cheap. Of course there’s some benefit but is it net positive? No idea. Is it hugely positive? Fuck no.

      • PattyMcB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Definitely not the panacea it’s being peddled as. I have yet to see the expectation pan out that I can work less and do the things I enjoy more. (Keep in mind I loved what I did for work so it didn’t used to seem like work. Now it does)