• Axolotl@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    edit-2
    28 minutes ago

    This is gonna be so bad because now there is only uBlock origin lite and “uBlock”, if you couln’t guess: the 2nd one is a scam that google never tried to remove(it’s been up for some years IIRC) and i am sure that everyone will try to install this scam because they can’t find the original uBlock origin (and everyone just refers to uBlock origin as uBlock which makes it worse)

    • Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      15 minutes ago

      the 2nd one is a scam that google never tried to remove

      It’s a little more complicated. uBlock was the original name, gorhil handed it off when he felt the maintenance burden became too high. Then he forked it to make his own uBlock Origin version.

      At some point later uBlock was bought up by the AdBlock people, who in turn were later bought by the AdBlock Plus people.

      So it’s not a scam exactly, more like an inbred sideline of the royal family.

  • danielfm123@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Install Firefox with https://adnauseam.io/, it’s basically ublock origin but internally clicks on every add destroying your adds profile and damaging economics of adds and conversion.

        • Axolotl@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          25 minutes ago

          Don’t, privacy badge and adnauseam will interfere eachothers and as result you will get worst results, you are better off using a DNS level adblocker (eg: Pihole or NextDNS if you don’t/can’t self host) alongside uBlock/adnauseam

  • EtzBetz@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Ah, thank god I am using Zen (Firefox fork) now for 2 years already. I totally forgot about this manifest bs. Now that Chrome introduced vertical tabs I was thinking to myself “ah, I could give it a try, having less breaking things and so on”. But thanks for this reminder I will gladly stay with Zen.

    • utopiah@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      57 minutes ago

      FWIW I do think you should give it a go.

      Firefox is main browser, on desktop and mobile, and I’m not changing that.

      Still, I do have Chromium installed for very specific usages, e.g. WebXR tests, WebBT and WebUSB devices, e.g. flashing keyboard firmware, controlling Lego bricks, etc. I’d rather only have Firefox to be clear but some things are not supported, marked as not planned, and I believe using Chromium on specific Websites, not for browsing, is perfectly fine when no alternative is available.

    • Tingle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      43 minutes ago

      I switched to Zen a week ago and I haven’t ran into any issues with it, what do you find is broken with it?

    • FrChazzz@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Switched to Zen as soon as I switched to Linux about a year and a half ago. Love it.

      • RephlectioNZ@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        58 minutes ago

        Another Zen user chiming in to say, all the other ones seem confusing and cluttered now.

  • 7U5K3N@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Damn it.

    Gotta use chrome at work.

    Firefox “isn’t secure and isn’t supported” - my it director

    • neclimdul@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      isnt secure… tell you dont understand security without telling me you don’t understand security.

    • datendefekt@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Work at a larger organization and the only browser we’re allowed is fucking Edge. All other browsers are blocked as malicious processes.

      • Crit@lemmy.wtf
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Company hardware isn’t checked by user agents but actual running processes

        • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          You’re saying they have some sort of app that actively blocks firefox from running on their laptop? I fortunately never worked in a company that did something like this. I would say it’s more likely that the web application simply checks user agent and blocks unsupported browsers.

          • Crit@lemmy.wtf
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            54 minutes ago

            Yes, companies have software running on company property usually that checks what you’re running and installing. I can’t even get admin perms on my work machine without asking IT with a good reason. They can also see your browser history and what websites you go to, as an fyi to not browse anything that you wouldn’t feel comfortable talking to your boss and HR about on a work machine.

      • neo2478@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        42 minutes ago

        Fuck Brave. Their CEO is a homophobic transphobe asshole who actively donates money to help take away peoples rights, they are shills for a bunch of AI and crypto BS that is inbuilt in the browser, and they at least used to steal affiliate links.

    • sunbeam60@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Just a crying shame Mozilla has turned into a commercial nightmare making them relatively poor custodians of the only free choice we have left.

      Mozilla needs to die so Firefox can live.

      The income stream from Firefox is plenty for a highly technical, deeply competent, widely dispersed team could work full time on the product using something like OpenCollective.

      Instead what we get is prime SF real estate offices, “competitive” SF salaries and a commercial organisation that seeks weird and increasingly desperate income streams to justify looking like “real company”.

      I want an actual non-profit governing Firefox.

    • GeirGrusom@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 minutes ago

      Lite was made for Manifest V3. They had to drop a bunch of features to get it functioning which is why it’s called “Lite”.

      • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        38 minutes ago

        It won’t for long. Its only because Ungoogled Chromium is on a stable channel, but this removal will catch up to them soon.

        This goes for all Chromium browsers, except those that hack in their own adblock engine like Cromite or Brave.

  • DeadPixel@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Sing it with me:

    Chrome, huh, yeah.
    What is it good for?
    Absolutely nothing, uhh….

      • BassTurd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        84
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Care to elaborate? It’s actually not like chrome at all. The engine is different, it’s not Google, they haven’t blocked manifest v2 plugins… Other than being a web browser, how would you classify it as Chrome?

        • kratoz29@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Huh, do we have engagement bots in Lemmy already?

          We’re thriving guys!

    • John Richard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      76
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Not really. UBlock Origin Lite works really well. They even added content scripts recently. From a technical perspective MV3 offers more security by default.

      • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        33 minutes ago

        In practice, I found it breaks sites more, lets some things through, triggers more adblock detectors, and doesn’t work as well with the annoyance list.

        It doesn’t work on YouTube. And the maximum number of entries to block is limited.

        Its not catastrophic though.

        So UBO Lite is not wholly ineffective, no. It works great, mostly. Buts its definitely more of a nuisance to use, which is exactly what Google wants.

      • Communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        36
        ·
        8 hours ago

        The following filter options can’t be translated into DNR rules:

        strict1p, strict3p: whether a network request is same-origin as its initiator
        Entity-based values for domain= filter option (webextensions #394)
        redirect-rule=: the DNR API does not support redirect-if-blocked concept (webextensions #493)
        Click-to-load embedded contexts through redirect=click2load.html filter option
        Regex-based removeparam= modifier filter options
        Exceptions for all modifier filter options are not possible
            Workarounds exist for removeparam= and csp= by carefully tuning the priority property.
        Many very useful regex-based filters used in uBO are not allowed, or are rejected by the DNR API (webextensions #344)
        replace=, can't modify the response body (full support is only possible with Firefox MV2)
        ipaddress=, can't use IP address as a condition to block/unblock (full support is only possible with Firefox MV2)
        urlskip=, this requires programmatic steps to extract a URL from another URL (partial support, for strict-blocked pages only)
        

        aside from that it is somewhat better than default ublock but that’s a pretty big list of issues.

  • Eternal192@anarchist.nexus
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    131
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Anyone that uses Chrome doesn’t know what a clean non ad infested website looks like so they won’t notice the difference.

        • rockSlayer@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          8 hours ago

          I actually do a pretty good job of selling it. I tell them that I can set up Firefox so using the Internet is easier. I’m 3/5 so far

        • bandanawearingbanana@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Firefox on Android has gotten quite shit as well. It just refuses to load sometimes and won’t open pages until you copy and paste the url in a new tab. Extremly annoying, especially for online payments.

          • takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 hour ago

            That sounds like maybe you have something else set as default browser and instead of Firefox and that something is messaging it up.

            I use Firefox exclusively and it works everywhere.

            Unless, URLCheck (highly recommended) is somehow fixing this issue. But I don’t remember having it before either.

              • WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 hours ago

                I have 300 tabs open…

                Amateur. Try over 1,200 with the option to put those not used in a while into an “inactive” group turned off.

                Hmm… Maybe that’s my last phone crashed & burned recently…

    • username_1@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Well, you don’t need to be a genius to imagine a concrete site without shit. Chrome users apparently love advertisements, trackers, pop-up windows and other similar things. Well, who are we to disagree?

    • John Richard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      35
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Not true. UBlock Origin Lite works just fine. They even recently added the ability to use content scripts so there is almost no difference between it and the original UBlock. Manifest 3 has had and still has some challenges, but you’re being so hyperbolic that I can’t take anything people like you say seriously. Might as well say… “I hate Chrome so much that I’ll make up random lies to prove how bad it is!”

        • John Richard@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          18
          ·
          5 hours ago

          First, I don’t care if they agree with me or not. It is an open source project. They said from they never intended to try to make a 1:1 extension with UBO. They clearly lay out the positives of MV3 as well, and the scripts permission feature is a relatively new addition. You or anyone can contribute or fork it you want to add something.

          I have spent enough time working on MV3 to know Chromium has solved a lot of the challenges. If you want to have a technical discussion about the APIs and differences or how you might do something with MV3, then let’s have the discussion. I never tried to claim MV3 is perfect.

          I just have little patience for essentially non-technical cultists who go around spreading misinformation while acting like they know way more than they do. Prove it then… 99% of people like you never actually want to have a real technical discussion, because you spread your opinions based on feelings and not facts.

          • ThirdConsul@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Prove it then… 99% of people like you never actually want to have a real technical discussion, because you spread your opinions based on feelings and not facts.

            This is extremely funny that you’re trying to insult me, based on your feelings and not facts.

            My only participation in this thread was that UBO Lite creator disagrees with you, which he publicly stated, but you felt… Offended? (No idea) - and decided to insult me rather than to deal with facts.

            There is a word for people like you.

            Troll.

          • doben@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            5 hours ago

            I‘m a semi-technical user, I don‘t want a technical discussion, I want facts I‘m able to understand. If you‘d be knowledgeable, you should be able to explain it. You didn‘t, tho. You used a lot of words, but said nothing. Why should your arrogant, but empty yapping do anything for me?

  • DigDoug@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    88
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Given how long ago this was announced, anybody still using Chrome doesn’t care.

      • Carl@anarchist.nexus
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        36
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Yeah, pretty much this. In regards to tech, the fediverse often suffers from the average familiarity problem:

        The average user barely even knows how to check their email.

        • mycodesucks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          6 hours ago

          My empathy for this view dies on shit that impacts you every single day of your life. At that point it’s not a bit of information you just haven’t needed yet - it’s willful ignorance that I’m not giving you a pass on.

          How long do I need to watch people crap themselves before I’m allowed to demand they learn to use a toilet?

          • HuudaHarkiten@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            3 hours ago

            Oh, don’t get me wrong. I didn’t mean that you should have empathy. Of course its their own fault for not figuring this shit out, takes 3 minutes to do. In fact, I actively mock people when ever I see them using the internet without a condom. I find thats the easiest way to get them to be interested, any time I have to use someone else machines, I go “hooooly fuck, what is all this shit? Do you have virus or something?! No? What adblocker do you use? YOU DONT?! What the fuck is the matter with you? Install ublock right away, are you insane?!” etc etc. Its quite fun to do.

            • Axolotl@feddit.it
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              3 hours ago

              Oh wait, that’s actually an approach i never thought of, effectively people will do something more willingly if they feel excluded from the circle

              • HuudaHarkiten@piefed.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                3 hours ago

                That, and people don’t want to be seen as the weird one, doing the “wrong” thing. So if you act like they have leprosy, they will think “huh, maybe I should take some medicine”

    • Chozo@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Or they just installed uBlock Origin Lite, which still works for most things.

    • BassTurd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Chromium is the browser that I open a few times a year for websites that don’t support Firefox. A few may be a gross over estimate.

        • BassTurd@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          8 hours ago

          It’s really seldom, but a few years back there was a government website that only worked with chrome or edge that I had to use. I had one the other night and found a work around. It’s a rare occurrence, and usually I can avoid it, but sometimes I have to just suck it up, do the deed, and bail.

          • brsrklf@jlai.lu
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            I don’t design web apps but I’ve heard for some that do that firefox occasionally has problems with them, because it relies a lot on caching (actually they used the term “aggressive caching”, with a few extra extra choice words).

            Anyway, usually not a problem. I use edge only for work since it’s the default browser and I barely do any actual browsing with it, mostly light app clients. On my own devices, it’s been firefox only for years.

    • ceenote@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      42
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      A thin layer of chromium on the surface of a metal to make it shiny and protect from corrosion.

        • BassTurd@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 hours ago

          I used to work in manufacturing and we made a sort of tube socket that was cadmium plated on the outside and chrome plated on the inside.

          I wonder how many people got cancer plating those things. Ironically, all of the platers were in California because it was banned for new plating centers in most other states.